Re: [net-next] net: ipv6: fix code style error and warning of ndisc.c

[David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>]

On 5/19/17 10:16 PM, yuan linyu wrote:
> @@ -240,13 +240,15 @@ struct ndisc_options *ndisc_parse_options(const struct net_device *dev,
>  					  "%s: duplicated ND6 option found: type=%d\n",
>  					  __func__, nd_opt->nd_opt_type);
>  			} else {
> -				ndopts->nd_opt_array[nd_opt->nd_opt_type] = nd_opt;
> +				ndopts->nd_opt_array[nd_opt->nd_opt_type] =
> +					nd_opt;
>  			}
>  			break;
>  		case ND_OPT_PREFIX_INFO:
>  			ndopts->nd_opts_pi_end = nd_opt;
>  			if (!ndopts->nd_opt_array[nd_opt->nd_opt_type])
> -				ndopts->nd_opt_array[nd_opt->nd_opt_type] = nd_opt;
> +				ndopts->nd_opt_array[nd_opt->nd_opt_type] =
> +					nd_opt;
>  			break;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTE_INFO
>  		case ND_OPT_ROUTE_INFO:

This makes the code less readable. Readability needs to trump rigid
80-column coding style.


> @@ -512,7 +513,8 @@ void ndisc_send_na(struct net_device *dev, const struct in6_addr *daddr,
>  		in6_ifa_put(ifp);
>  	} else {
>  		if (ipv6_dev_get_saddr(dev_net(dev), dev, daddr,
> -				       inet6_sk(dev_net(dev)->ipv6.ndisc_sk)->srcprefs,
> +				       inet6_sk(dev_net(dev)->ipv6.ndisc_sk)->
> +						srcprefs,

again here


I did not finish out this really long patch, but in general the
80-column rule can not be applied so rigidly.