Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] net: hsr: require valid EOT supervision TLV

[Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>]

On 4/1/26 7:05 PM, Luka Gejak wrote:
> On Wed Apr 1, 2026 at 11:52 AM CEST, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
>> On 4/1/26 11:23 AM, luka.gejak@linux.dev wrote:
>>> From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
>>>
>>> Supervision frames are only valid if terminated with a zero-length EOT
>>> TLV. The current check fails to reject non-EOT entries as the terminal
>>> TLV, potentially allowing malformed supervision traffic.
>>>
>>> Fix this by strictly requiring the terminal TLV to be HSR_TLV_EOT
>>> with a length of zero.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Felix Maurer <fmaurer@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
>>> ---
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This has not been reviewed by Felix. Felix provided his Reviewed-by tag
>> for the v1 which was completely different than this.
>>
>> Revisions of this patch:
>>
>> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260329112313.17164-4-luka.gejak@linux.dev/
>>
>> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260326154715.38405-4-luka.gejak@linux.dev/
>>
>> v1:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260324143503.187642-4-luka.gejak@linux.dev/
>>
>> Are these contributions LLM/AI generated? I believe so based on the
>> email history.
>>
>> AI generated review on rtl8723bs:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/B2394A3C-25FD-4CEA-8557-3E68F1F60357@linux.dev/
>>
>> Another AI generated review on rtl8723bs:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/3831D599-655E-40B2-9E5D-9DF956013088@linux.dev/
>>
>> Likely an AI generated review on a 1 year old HSR patch:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/DHFG26KI6L23.1YCOVQ5SSYMO5@linux.dev/
>>
>> If these are indeed, AI generated contributions or reviews they should
>> be disclosed beforehand. Also there is the Assisted-by: tag. Also note
>> that developer must take full responsibility for the contribution which
>> means understanding it completely.
>>
>> https://docs.kernel.org/process/coding-assistants.html#signed-off-by-and-developer-certificate-of-origin
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Fernando.
> 
> HI Fernando,
> One more question, should I include Assisted-by tag in v5 if AI was not
> used for writing code but only for formating and translation of the
> emails to English as I previously mentioned.
> 

I think yes, you should. I also think that AI was actually used for the 
generated code and also for spotting the valid and invalid issues. If 
you don't have a real environment for HSR, why would you look into it?

Sorry, it is not my intention to be harsh but there are some things that 
don't add up for me. Maybe I am being too careful here and you just 
coincidentally found these problems.

> Best regards,
> Luka Gejak
>