From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53A6C33C99 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34442080A for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:34:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1578389640; bh=0RwFzwAEmrIP5sG0tKGrxv2D/cxDWEkx4BvAxCF7YcY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=addXw0Q4QYK787GGnzXgTR1M2CbGJHpP7yevndRAPTGuJBSxwx/OL8xDr3hFNKoL6 AM7lvNAGRCOIEjgRcQn6hwqhFCHVTCzUHfMUwvvLlQXbzJOAwBJX9/m/n5nSOKL+OT EwMEJNbo4wqlZRY6gKshK1bz9+7q4vGvbq/4j2Lw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727809AbgAGJd6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 04:33:58 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37506 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726565AbgAGJd5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 04:33:57 -0500 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D9B7206DB; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:33:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1578389637; bh=0RwFzwAEmrIP5sG0tKGrxv2D/cxDWEkx4BvAxCF7YcY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=H4MhWpEv9OaFCgT3pOtwNa8691FoPe9u0TYSCg/+0HvXNb3xrg8Z0UMTp3WlgCN9V sZneQrxj1cZTzcdnNMP4HyRW3GUYvhQYxpSdzhrj9w+ugT+W+e09aturGqr6jVjdnQ EuPegGrp4+ChfhOaNGONnb4I074kMSLOP/LCXt6g= Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org ([51.254.78.96] helo=www.loen.fr) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iolFL-000143-D1; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 09:33:55 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 09:33:55 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Jianyong Wu , netdev@vger.kernel.org, yangbo.lu@nxp.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, richardcochran@gmail.com, Mark Rutland , will@kernel.org, Suzuki Poulose , Steven Price , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Steve Capper , Kaly Xin , Justin He , nd Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 0/8] Enable ptp_kvm for arm64 In-Reply-To: References: <20191210034026.45229-1-jianyong.wu@arm.com> Message-ID: <7a589be6dc0d5562caf8c8f795b31efc@kernel.org> X-Sender: maz@kernel.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.8 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 51.254.78.96 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: pbonzini@redhat.com, Jianyong.Wu@arm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, yangbo.lu@nxp.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, richardcochran@gmail.com, Mark.Rutland@arm.com, will@kernel.org, Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com, Steven.Price@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Steve.Capper@arm.com, Kaly.Xin@arm.com, Justin.He@arm.com, nd@arm.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 2020-01-07 08:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 06/01/20 10:38, Jianyong Wu wrote: >> Ping ... >> Any comments to this patch set? > > Marc, Will, can you ack it? Since the sticky point was the detection > of > the clocksource and it was solved by Thomas's patch, I don't have any > more problems including it. Boo. I had forgotten about this series. :-( Going back to it, there is a few ugly points in the arm-specific code (I'm OK with the generic changes though). Another thing is that the whole series depends on three patches that have never been posted to any list, hence never reviewed. Jianyong: Please repost this series *with* the dependencies so that they can be reviewed, once you've addressed my comments on two of the patches. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...