From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-179.mta0.migadu.com (out-179.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B17B2EFDAA for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 17:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.179 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753465728; cv=none; b=ue8x7hGvvqY0Q+30cb2roHwmVq0SMVBgozV7JaA9EZpgarva5BJTgFhBNL2Bg78Bcmgq4l3z67R13QT3q/QXZqb4LVuTFDmO8u0tVh96E5aUwXC0zJBKaqti+X2ueZS7lu0nw6se2+JEwQz3ahBmkP3wF7XTZQd1lBSwB6g0Rm8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753465728; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xW/eRBf28FKWPcdt8VFjDq1uhVkuQiqBuifYuIeI5rc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=WNFGlshuBlaROBnEnzAQQR58Eg1UZv8IYG8BX2wdkXbYUnrsz5EG7QGiBmr04Xmzr/4+nspxJMRttg+wbDC3GEro0mQJFscuG+GKZLrTxPH9AuAbP/GT6ekIYw3+/rUdxLPQLEp7aQxL5mVBNUMQNV2qwJyJxgPffVZ/AQzdaPM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=wDA5KYi9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.179 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="wDA5KYi9" Message-ID: <7b88650d-e9dd-4c3b-b377-2017b5f982b0@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1753465724; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xW/eRBf28FKWPcdt8VFjDq1uhVkuQiqBuifYuIeI5rc=; b=wDA5KYi9iMY1zQ4xfOOYElml0bGlurX9QwTvC9slvjA9sLCABlLJYsh8U7cRvFqNh/lxKO cDQmOQ7VOK4nTDrEPsCoiU1jdzMrz4RqZmGs+j4QsLIQaE1Y5lTpd4wqbpD46ABQp55iFF zItWuKgKfmESPUDA00YII8fs6KjkvkE= Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 10:48:36 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Use correct destructor kfunc types Content-Language: en-GB To: Sami Tolvanen Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Vadim Fedorenko , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Jamal Hadi Salim , Cong Wang , Jiri Pirko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250724223225.1481960-6-samitolvanen@google.com> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Yonghong Song In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 7/25/25 10:20 AM, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 9:54 AM Yonghong Song wrote: >> I just tried arm64 with your patch set. CFI crash still happened: >> >> CFI failure at tcp_ack+0xe74/0x13cc (target: bpf__tcp_congestion_ops_in_ack_event+0x0/0x78; expected type: 0x64424 >> 87a) > This one should fixed by the other series I posted earlier: > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250722205357.3347626-5-samitolvanen@google.com/ Okay, I see. We can delay arm64 for now and focus on x86 side as I can observe some issues with CONFIG_CFI_CLANG. > > Sami