From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.molgen.mpg.de (mx3.molgen.mpg.de [141.14.17.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 282E91EB23 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:26:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=molgen.mpg.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=molgen.mpg.de Received: from [192.168.0.224] (ip5f5ae9b3.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [95.90.233.179]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pmenzel) by mx.molgen.mpg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16D6D61E5FE01; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 08:26:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <7bfd7069-8222-4388-bc1f-d4e77093b503@molgen.mpg.de> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 08:26:16 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird From: Paul Menzel Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1] ixgbe: Convert ret val type from s32 to int To: Jedrzej Jagielski Cc: Jacob Keller , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com References: <20240103101135.386891-1-jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20240103101135.386891-1-jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit [Re-sent with diff removed, so message size limit of 90 kB of list Intel-wired-lan is met.] Dear Jedrzej, Thank you for your patch. Am 03.01.24 um 11:11 schrieb Jedrzej Jagielski: > Currently big amount of the functions returning standard > error codes are of type s32. Convert them to regular > ints. Please make use of the full allowed text width of 75 characters per line. Also please add the motivation. Why are regular ints better? […] Kind regards, Paul