From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sh_eth: Change platform check to CONFIG_ARCH_RENESAS Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 13:56:16 +0300 Message-ID: <7ca9e327-736d-4372-10a0-b90dbafb797b@cogentembedded.com> References: <1526640771-473-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven , "David S . Miller" Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f67.google.com ([209.85.215.67]:45263 "EHLO mail-lf0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751117AbeERK4T (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2018 06:56:19 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f67.google.com with SMTP id w202-v6so13261316lff.12 for ; Fri, 18 May 2018 03:56:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1526640771-473-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> Content-Language: en-MW Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/18/2018 01:52 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Since commit 9b5ba0df4ea4f940 ("ARM: shmobile: Introduce ARCH_RENESAS") > is CONFIG_ARCH_RENESAS a more appropriate platform check than the legacy "If" should follow, not precede the option as this is not a question. :-) > CONFIG_ARCH_SHMOBILE, hence use the former. > > Renesas SuperH SH-Mobile SoCs are still covered by the CONFIG_CPU_SH4 > check. > > This will allow to drop ARCH_SHMOBILE on ARM and ARM64 in the near > future. > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman [...] MBR, Sergei