From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thibaut VARENE" Subject: Re: kernel BUG in eth_alloc_tx_desc_index at drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c:1069! Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:56:59 +0100 Message-ID: <7d01f9f00701090256q5d04094bs4d636b128a61bc29@mail.gmail.com> References: <7d01f9f00701051103q3ee6ed35q9fd0f778a18061b8@mail.gmail.com> <20070109092602.GC1703@ff.dom.local> <7d01f9f00701090227v60b37e5dy6afbf70ccde58bf2@mail.gmail.com> <20070109105244.GD1703@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]:26242 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751338AbXAIK5B (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 05:57:01 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 44so6530681uga for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 02:57:00 -0800 (PST) To: "Jarek Poplawski" In-Reply-To: <20070109105244.GD1703@ff.dom.local> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 1/9/07, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:27:59AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > ... > > I suspected both and changed both the disk and the ram for quality > > parts, that I tested afterwards. Both passed thorough tests. > > You wrote about half an hour, so overheating was also > considered, I presume. Yes, but since it works fine with the other NIC... :) > > Finally, using the other NIC on the box (a VIA Rhine II, 100Mbps), > > works absolutely fine. > > So it looks like the card/driver (or maybe this specimen?). I'm suspecting the driver, but I'm not a specialist :) It's true that this particular card specimen could be damaged even though that seems a bit unlikely. HTH T-Bone -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/