From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@realtek.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] r8169: allocate rx buffers using alloc_pages_node
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 21:38:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d79d794-b41c-101f-0720-59eea88bf9ab@gmail.com> (raw)
We allocate 16kb per rx buffer, so we can avoid some overhead by using
alloc_pages_node directly instead of bothering kmalloc_node. Due to
this change buffers are page-aligned now, therefore the alignment check
can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 45 ++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
index 3c7af6669..4f0b32280 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ struct rtl8169_private {
struct RxDesc *RxDescArray; /* 256-aligned Rx descriptor ring */
dma_addr_t TxPhyAddr;
dma_addr_t RxPhyAddr;
- void *Rx_databuff[NUM_RX_DESC]; /* Rx data buffers */
+ struct page *Rx_databuff[NUM_RX_DESC]; /* Rx data buffers */
struct ring_info tx_skb[NUM_TX_DESC]; /* Tx data buffers */
u16 cp_cmd;
u16 irq_mask;
@@ -5261,12 +5261,13 @@ static inline void rtl8169_make_unusable_by_asic(struct RxDesc *desc)
}
static void rtl8169_free_rx_databuff(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
- void **data_buff, struct RxDesc *desc)
+ struct page **data_buff,
+ struct RxDesc *desc)
{
- dma_unmap_single(tp_to_dev(tp), le64_to_cpu(desc->addr),
- R8169_RX_BUF_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+ dma_unmap_page(tp_to_dev(tp), le64_to_cpu(desc->addr),
+ R8169_RX_BUF_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
- kfree(*data_buff);
+ __free_pages(*data_buff, get_order(R8169_RX_BUF_SIZE));
*data_buff = NULL;
rtl8169_make_unusable_by_asic(desc);
}
@@ -5281,38 +5282,30 @@ static inline void rtl8169_mark_to_asic(struct RxDesc *desc)
desc->opts1 = cpu_to_le32(DescOwn | eor | R8169_RX_BUF_SIZE);
}
-static struct sk_buff *rtl8169_alloc_rx_data(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
- struct RxDesc *desc)
+static struct page *rtl8169_alloc_rx_data(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
+ struct RxDesc *desc)
{
- void *data;
- dma_addr_t mapping;
struct device *d = tp_to_dev(tp);
int node = dev_to_node(d);
+ dma_addr_t mapping;
+ struct page *data;
- data = kmalloc_node(R8169_RX_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL, node);
+ data = alloc_pages_node(node, GFP_KERNEL, get_order(R8169_RX_BUF_SIZE));
if (!data)
return NULL;
- /* Memory should be properly aligned, but better check. */
- if (!IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)data, 8)) {
- netdev_err_once(tp->dev, "RX buffer not 8-byte-aligned\n");
- goto err_out;
- }
-
- mapping = dma_map_single(d, data, R8169_RX_BUF_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+ mapping = dma_map_page(d, data, 0, R8169_RX_BUF_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(d, mapping))) {
if (net_ratelimit())
netif_err(tp, drv, tp->dev, "Failed to map RX DMA!\n");
- goto err_out;
+ __free_pages(data, get_order(R8169_RX_BUF_SIZE));
+ return NULL;
}
desc->addr = cpu_to_le64(mapping);
rtl8169_mark_to_asic(desc);
- return data;
-err_out:
- kfree(data);
- return NULL;
+ return data;
}
static void rtl8169_rx_clear(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
@@ -5337,7 +5330,7 @@ static int rtl8169_rx_fill(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
unsigned int i;
for (i = 0; i < NUM_RX_DESC; i++) {
- void *data;
+ struct page *data;
data = rtl8169_alloc_rx_data(tp, tp->RxDescArray + i);
if (!data) {
@@ -5892,6 +5885,7 @@ static int rtl_rx(struct net_device *dev, struct rtl8169_private *tp, u32 budget
for (rx_left = min(budget, NUM_RX_DESC); rx_left > 0; rx_left--, cur_rx++) {
unsigned int entry = cur_rx % NUM_RX_DESC;
+ const void *rx_buf = page_address(tp->Rx_databuff[entry]);
struct RxDesc *desc = tp->RxDescArray + entry;
u32 status;
@@ -5946,9 +5940,8 @@ static int rtl_rx(struct net_device *dev, struct rtl8169_private *tp, u32 budget
goto release_descriptor;
}
- prefetch(tp->Rx_databuff[entry]);
- skb_copy_to_linear_data(skb, tp->Rx_databuff[entry],
- pkt_size);
+ prefetch(rx_buf);
+ skb_copy_to_linear_data(skb, rx_buf, pkt_size);
skb->tail += pkt_size;
skb->len = pkt_size;
--
2.22.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-08-07 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-07 19:38 Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2019-08-08 2:00 ` [PATCH net-next] r8169: allocate rx buffers using alloc_pages_node Hayes Wang
2019-08-09 5:35 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7d79d794-b41c-101f-0720-59eea88bf9ab@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).