Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/10] pds_core: Various improvements and AQ race condition cleanup

[Brett Creeley <bcreeley@amd.com>]

On 1/26/2024 8:44 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
> 
> 
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:42:45 -0800 Brett Creeley wrote:
>> This series includes the following changes:
>>
>> There can be many users of the pds_core's adminq. This includes
>> pds_core's uses and any clients that depend on it. When the pds_core
>> device goes through a reset for any reason the adminq is freed
>> and reconfigured. There are some gaps in the current implementation
>> that will cause crashes during reset if any of the previously mentioned
>> users of the adminq attempt to use it after it's been freed.
>>
>> Issues around how resets are handled, specifically regarding the driver's
>> error handlers.
> 
> Patches 1, 2 and 4 look like fixes. Is there any reason these are
> targeting net-next? If someone deploys this device at scale rare
> things will happen a lot..

No reason, just an oversight on my part. I actually think patches 1, 2, 
3, 4, 5, and 9 could all go to net. Unfortunately some of these patches 
are intertwined (i.e. patch 10 depends on patch 9).

If I push the previously mentioned patches to net and they get accepted, 
how soon are fixes typically added to the net-next tree so I can 
rebase/re-push the remaining patches?

Thank for the review,

Brett