From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johann Baudy Subject: Re: [PATCH] TX_RING and packet mmap Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:40:12 +0200 Message-ID: <7e0dd21a0904070740i74a35d91t311a70afc74e83e3@mail.gmail.com> References: <1238701718.5669.26.camel@bender> <20090407072647.GA11480@gondor.apana.org.au> <1239108520.32737.28.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> <20090407130447.GA14329@gondor.apana.org.au> <1239112067.32737.51.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Herbert Xu , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Patrick McHardy To: hadi@cyberus.ca Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.218.169]:53272 "EHLO mail-bw0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755641AbZDGOkO (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:40:14 -0400 Received: by bwz17 with SMTP id 17so2342075bwz.37 for ; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:40:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1239112067.32737.51.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi All, Many thanks for your replies! Indeed, I've tried to find a solution to store data in skb (valid until destructor). I've chosen this solution according to previous email on this subject: http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2008/11/11/93 I thought skb->mark was not used anymore at this level. So I've used it to forward buffer index. Do you think this solution is not acceptable? Thanks, Johann