From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johann Baudy Subject: Re: [PATCH] TX_RING and packet mmap Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:00:15 +0200 Message-ID: <7e0dd21a0905121100l658867dds309dc1c4205d5058@mail.gmail.com> References: <1242076914.12380.2.camel@bender> <87octymhbt.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <7e0dd21a0905121058m1f894de6q9805e5392aef3aea@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Patrick McHardy , jamal , Christoph Lameter , Evgeniy Polyakov To: Andi Kleen Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f222.google.com ([209.85.218.222]:51108 "EHLO mail-bw0-f222.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751955AbZELSAQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2009 14:00:16 -0400 Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so130731bwz.37 for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 11:00:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7e0dd21a0905121058m1f894de6q9805e5392aef3aea@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Andi, > When you add new interfaces like this you should add them to the pack= et (7) > manpage too. Currently, There is nothing in the manpage of packet(7) about RX_RING. However I can start to write a summary=A0 that describes processes, headers and statuses of both feature (RX_RING and TX_RING). I think "Socket Options" section of packet(7) is appropriate. Johann