From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Matt Vollrath <tactii@gmail.com>
Cc: <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next 0/3] iavf: defer loading netmem_desc
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 17:13:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e9a5228-d257-4adb-b472-b110f60e3618@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731124109.99065-1-tactii@gmail.com>
From: Matt Vollrath <tactii@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 08:41:06 -0400
> In a few places libeth and the iavf driver inspect which page pool is
> attached to a netmem_ref. This forces an immediate load of the
> netmem_desc struct for each buffer in the Rx loop.
>
> Defer or eliminate these loads of netmem_desc from the driver fast path
> by using the page_pool ref in the first cache line of iavf_ring instead.
I was thinking of this when implementing the current design, but:
Do you have any data to prove this actually helps performance?
>
> There are only two paths out of the Rx loop where netmem_desc needs to
> be consumed:
> * The "very rare" case of libeth_rx_sync_for_cpu calling
> libeth_rx_recycle_slow and indicating that there was no data. This
> could be similarly factored out, but not by this series.
> * GRO merging a frame into an existing aggregate stream. In this case,
> the cold load of netmem_desc may overlap the payload prefetch started
> by iavf_build_skb, which is now no longer dependent on netmem_desc to
> start.
Thanks,
Olek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 12:41 [PATCH iwl-next 0/3] iavf: defer loading netmem_desc Matt Vollrath
2026-07-31 12:41 ` [PATCH iwl-next 1/3] libeth: add __libeth_rx_sync_for_cpu Matt Vollrath
2026-07-31 13:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-07-31 12:41 ` [PATCH iwl-next 2/3] iavf: use __libeth_rx_sync_for_cpu Matt Vollrath
2026-07-31 13:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-07-31 12:41 ` [PATCH iwl-next 3/3] iavf: use cached page_pool ref in skb helpers Matt Vollrath
2026-07-31 13:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-07-31 15:13 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2026-07-31 19:27 ` [PATCH iwl-next 0/3] iavf: defer loading netmem_desc Matt Vollrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e9a5228-d257-4adb-b472-b110f60e3618@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=tactii@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox