From: Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek@pps.jussieu.fr>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stochastic Fair Blue queue discipline
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:38:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7i3apwbblk.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873apwrc4t.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (Andi Kleen's message of "Tue\, 08 Apr 2008 10\:20\:34 +0200")
> (read Documentation/CodingStyle)
Will do, thanks for the pointer.
>> +static unsigned sfb_hash(struct sk_buff *skb, int hash, int filter,
>> + struct sfb_sched_data *q)
> I think we have multiple qdiscs now doing very similar such hashes.
> Any chance this could be factored out into a common library function
> first?
I'll be glad to do so. Where shall I put it?
> Getting high res time can be actually somewhat expensive on different
> platforms. I would recommend to only use it if it's actually needed in
> the inelastic flow case below and use jiffies to check for rehashing.
Good point.
> /dev/random is a precious resource (some systems have very little
> true entropy) and getting that much data from it regularly is not
> a good idea because you take it away from other users who really
> need it
In the default configuration, I'm getting 32 bytes every 10 minutes,
which seemed reasonable. This code was copied from sch_sfq (function
sfq_perturbation), which does the very same thing.
> But in any case it is likely better you only get the
> get_random_bytes() entropy once and then use that to init some kind
> of RNG (either a secure one if it's for security or some random fast
> one if it's not) and then use that output for rehashing.
Could do, but in that case the RNG should be shared between sfq and
sfb. Shall I simply use net_random (which calls random32) ?
Juliusz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-08 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-07 22:37 [PATCH] Stochastic Fair Blue queue discipline Juliusz Chroboczek
2008-04-08 0:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-08 0:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-08 15:28 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2008-04-08 8:20 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-08 12:11 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-08 15:39 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2008-04-08 15:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-09 15:48 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2008-04-09 16:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-08 15:38 ` Juliusz Chroboczek [this message]
2008-04-08 16:32 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-08 17:35 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2008-04-08 17:53 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-09 15:45 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2008-04-09 17:49 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-10 1:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-10 1:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-10 11:17 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2008-04-11 13:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-04-10 14:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-04-10 7:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-08 16:44 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7i3apwbblk.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr \
--to=juliusz.chroboczek@pps.jussieu.fr \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).