From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.24 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794006648; b=J5AuWytutLI12qsCsl7wNE0KijZySOaLSZnW7+1JxFmv+ti0E0f+bhgkQQXcBH3bK26s dc1bE/TUJ81sdkphZpvLE1k7T0IDqz6Q/sUN8BSoGi8pEH94gE5H4NxQSxMsaBK19nrLl cObNC4790VNFVy8MdI73UQN7eOEsYyV8eQYf2gc0xYl66hAOjdQil3bDD4TgBQlp55pZX BCinE9qicAgdQWqzaKwA/67u17DLitaYevHzJjzfvkBAY/MyY9Vgqr1/zByh5qWui9Cki s9mBV0sopeDEzLmmoUGM42z6P/C4zZLHTEzn2v3TY0kcWuGjkO4yvtiCpeJsGaAt3pw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794006648; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:User-Agent:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=SSu8sahHYtJP4tYEpVQa1z5i0RcdS7+U4e1oKrlexBE=; b=YKrr0bDsuPNLjB0ELF2uhb9uupiL5J2s3MJP5+qTvuiVvJzlEL1bPwU4pN51+oEZpuBZ bFGQXobLRUbCgZbHqOrofkKVGSXCFrF//nDGttu8WgOXNKAa2JOiB02O5E6BEOwcJmjym c3/o+0ox0K4TaSKHpjzgCZ9U1nvLkHQTgJviKb+Hq4OoMYmPA0hGB6b7358TJ8AyMjSSy a814mAokjOjcE+Uj5WYBc/9oUldafEadz7lEAFgCIGiXLUR4lROZmVghJKvoYwITZ/DfF cpSz5tcWtp8DcSW5A1kTX31TfFaTtBjw91t2o4vE2SGkBM/3KRxGumqrdOFjRwMIz/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.24 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-24.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8397D606A32C for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 23:10:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 8397D606A32C Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev X-Envelope-To: netdev@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=bSp589ynlUSbkHZ/Pc8oj+44xLBN6TotbLXU3BpwP8Q=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1794006640; v=1; x=1794611440; b=QVdBHXCf+YgkLKYumhrLD6fpuUKcp+E/ZAqbFq9mwZooLmomr5cTdrc4rP9finr0QLFyh2ne CHFzaErK1kkzmQMX9iLCJOvg8dXjH5A+LgjuIlEZCaje1eD93ZQkyCrW/+1Fk1R7XSi5/A6sWYc mOtLmfjd1H+usMO9Ytx58ofw= X-Envelope-To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Received: by mta10.migadu.com with ESMTPS id f5adb69807cbc1e0; Fri, 06 Nov 2026 23:10:40 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: f5adb69807cbc1e0 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT From: Roman Gushchin To: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org Cc: alex.aring@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] 6lowpan: fix netdev_priv() type confusion in lowpan_event() In-Reply-To: <179400615048.488859.9102835578031186781@kernel.org> (netdev-bot's message of "Fri, 06 Nov 2026 23:02:30 +0000") References: <20261106225930.1379968-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev> <179400615048.488859.9102835578031186781@kernel.org> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.15; emacs 30.2 Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 23:10:33 +0000 Message-ID: <7ia4fqxd8sk6.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org writes: > Hi! > > This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its > commit messages seem to be missing some information: > > - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical > (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include > the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. > > Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, > reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers > can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for > other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages > then. > > The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think > that is the case please reply and explain. I've a reproducer which I don't want to post publicly but can share privately.