netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, wexu@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC V3 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring for vhost
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:04:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <803cf7fa-6c74-0506-d609-8f0b79b2c254@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180423201151.GD5215@char.us.oracle.com>



On 2018年04月24日 04:11, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:59:43PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 03:31:20PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:34:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> Hi all:
>>>>
>>>> This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with
>>>> Tiwei's RFC V2 a thttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/48. Some fixups and
>>>> tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run. TCP stream
>>>> and pktgen does not show obvious difference compared with split ring.
>>> I have to ask then - what is the benefit of this?
>> You can use this with dpdk within guest.
>> The DPDK version did see a performance improvement so hopefully with
> Is there a link to this performance improvement document?
>

You probably want to this:

https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@dpdk.org/msg97735.html

Thanks
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

      reply	other threads:[~2018-04-24  1:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-23  5:34 [RFC V3 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring for vhost Jason Wang
2018-04-23  5:34 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 1/8] vhost: move get_rx_bufs to vhost.c Jason Wang
2018-05-02  8:05   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-03  7:19     ` Jason Wang
2018-04-23  5:34 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 2/8] vhost: hide used ring layout from device Jason Wang
2018-04-23  5:34 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 3/8] vhost: do not use vring_used_elem Jason Wang
2018-04-23  5:34 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 4/8] vhost_net: do not explicitly manipulate vhost_used_elem Jason Wang
2018-04-23  5:34 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 5/8] vhost: vhost_put_user() can accept metadata type Jason Wang
2018-04-23  5:34 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 6/8] virtio: introduce packed ring defines Jason Wang
2018-04-23  5:34 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 7/8] vhost: packed ring support Jason Wang
2018-04-23  5:35 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 8/8] vhost: event suppression for packed ring Jason Wang
2018-04-23 19:31 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring for vhost Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-23 19:59   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-23 20:11     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-24  1:04       ` Jason Wang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=803cf7fa-6c74-0506-d609-8f0b79b2c254@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wexu@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).