From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
simon.horman@netronome.com, mrv@mojatatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 1/4] net netlink: Add new type NLA_FLAG_BITS
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:00:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80dd1bc2-80d6-d8fa-6032-d0641ae5d79b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170612141450.GD1993@nanopsycho>
On 6/12/17 8:14 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> The thing is, struct nla_flag_bits is tightly coupled with NLA_FLAG_BITS
>>> enum value. They should be in the same uapi file. That makes sense to me.
>>>
>>
>> Sure - they should be in the same file. But is it uapi/linux/netlink.h?
>
> Might be the netlink-types.h you mentioned above.
>
> ccing DavidA.
>
Just saw this patch set this morning. Few comments:
1. I think nla_bitfield or nla_bitmap is a better name than nla_flag_bits
2. The length should be open ended with the size of the array determined
by nla_len / sizeof(struct nla_bitfield). That allows this to be
extended to an arbitrary large bitfield as needed.
3. IMO since these are nla prefixes and new NLA type they should be in
uapi/linux/netlink.h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-12 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-11 11:53 [PATCH net-next v10 0/4] net sched actions: improve dump performance Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-11 11:53 ` [PATCH net-next v10 1/4] net netlink: Add new type NLA_FLAG_BITS Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-11 13:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-11 17:38 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-11 18:37 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-12 10:34 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-12 11:10 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-12 11:43 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-12 13:51 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-12 14:14 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-12 15:00 ` David Ahern [this message]
2017-06-12 19:22 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-12 19:58 ` David Ahern
2017-06-13 5:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-13 10:53 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-13 11:25 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-13 13:58 ` David Ahern
2017-06-11 11:53 ` [PATCH net-next v10 2/4] net sched actions: Use proper root attribute table for actions Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-11 13:55 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-11 11:53 ` [PATCH net-next v10 3/4] net sched actions: dump more than TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-11 14:13 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-11 17:45 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-12 11:16 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-12 11:47 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-12 13:57 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-12 14:16 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-11 11:53 ` [PATCH net-next v10 4/4] net sched actions: add time filter for action dumping Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-11 12:06 ` [PATCH net-next v10 0/4] net sched actions: improve dump performance Jamal Hadi Salim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80dd1bc2-80d6-d8fa-6032-d0641ae5d79b@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=mrv@mojatatu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).