From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>, Oz Shlomo <ozsh@nvidia.com>,
Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] skbuff: Release nfct refcount on napi stolen or re-used skbs
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 15:45:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81587f89-df10-004e-6c79-34940fe04c16@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1621934002-16711-1-git-send-email-paulb@nvidia.com>
On 5/25/21 11:13 AM, Paul Blakey wrote:
> When multiple SKBs are merged to a new skb under napi GRO,
> or SKB is re-used by napi, if nfct was set for them in the
> driver, it will not be released while freeing their stolen
> head state or on re-use.
>
> Release nfct on napi's stolen or re-used SKBs.
>
> Fixes: 5c6b94604744 ("net/mlx5e: CT: Handle misses after executing CT action")
> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 1 +
> net/core/skbuff.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index ef8cf7619baf..a5324ca7dc65 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -6243,6 +6243,7 @@ static void napi_reuse_skb(struct napi_struct *napi, struct sk_buff *skb)
> skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type = 0;
> skb->truesize = SKB_TRUESIZE(skb_end_offset(skb));
> skb_ext_reset(skb);
> + nf_reset_ct(skb);
>
> napi->skb = skb;
> }
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 3ad22870298c..6127bab2fe2f 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -939,6 +939,7 @@ void __kfree_skb_defer(struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> void napi_skb_free_stolen_head(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> + nf_conntrack_put(skb_nfct(skb));
> skb_dst_drop(skb);
> skb_ext_put(skb);
> napi_skb_cache_put(skb);
>
Sadly we are very consistently making GRO slow as hell.
Why merging SKB with different ct would be allowed ?
If we accept this patch, then you will likely add another check in gro_list_prepare() ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-25 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-25 9:13 [PATCH net] skbuff: Release nfct refcount on napi stolen or re-used skbs Paul Blakey
2021-05-25 13:45 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2021-05-27 13:30 ` Paul Blakey
2021-05-25 14:47 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-25 14:50 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81587f89-df10-004e-6c79-34940fe04c16@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ozsh@nvidia.com \
--cc=paulb@nvidia.com \
--cc=roid@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=vladbu@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).