From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Mark expected switch fall-throughs and fix missing break Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:53:49 +0200 Message-ID: <8189d36d-1e12-c16d-4cb7-9aeefea3a6ff@embeddedor.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Kalle Valo , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jes Sorensen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from gateway32.websitewelcome.com ([192.185.145.1]:18146 "EHLO gateway32.websitewelcome.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727702AbeJVXNN (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:13:13 -0400 Received: from cm14.websitewelcome.com (cm14.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.7]) by gateway32.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F741AE90 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:54:18 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/22/18 4:36 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: > On 10/22/18 7:49 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, this patchset aims >> to mark multiple switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. >> >> Also, the second patch in this series fixes a missing break in switch. > > Enabling that sounds like a great way to inflict pain and suffering. > Not really. The -Wimplicit-fallthrough will be enabled until after all the current warnings have been addressed. There are 600 of these issues left. So, hopefully I will complete this task during the next development cycle. Thanks