From: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@codeaurora.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: transmit queued frames after waking queues
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 16:11:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8195be7603a8cd659d25a9c3d898b891@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180521204359.23884-1-niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
On 2018-05-21 13:43, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> The following problem was observed when running iperf:
[...]
>
> In order to avoid trying to flush the queue every time we free a frame,
> only do this when there are 3 or less frames pending, and while we
> actually have frames in the queue. This logic was copied from
> mt76_txq_schedule (mt76), one of few other drivers that are actually
> using wake_tx_queue.
>
> Suggested-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
> ---
> Changes since V1: use READ_ONCE() to disallow the compiler
> optimizing things in undesirable ways.
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
> index cda164f6e9f6..264cf0bd5c00 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ int ath10k_txrx_tx_unref(struct ath10k_htt *htt,
> wake_up(&htt->empty_tx_wq);
> spin_unlock_bh(&htt->tx_lock);
>
> + if (READ_ONCE(htt->num_pending_tx) <= 3 && !list_empty(&ar->txqs))
> + ath10k_mac_tx_push_pending(ar);
> +
Niklas,
Sorry for the late response. ath10k_mac_tx_push_pending is already
called
at the end of NAPI handler. Isn't that enough to process pending frames?
Earlier we observed performance issues in calling push_pending from each
tx completion. IMHO this change may introduce the same problem again.
-Rajkumar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-21 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-21 20:43 [PATCH v2] ath10k: transmit queued frames after waking queues Niklas Cassel
2018-05-21 23:11 ` Rajkumar Manoharan [this message]
2018-05-22 21:15 ` Niklas Cassel
2018-05-22 22:16 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-05-23 16:25 ` Erik Stromdahl
2018-05-23 18:05 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-05-23 22:44 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8195be7603a8cd659d25a9c3d898b891@codeaurora.org \
--to=rmanohar@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.cassel@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).