netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@codeaurora.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: transmit queued frames after waking queues
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 16:11:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8195be7603a8cd659d25a9c3d898b891@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180521204359.23884-1-niklas.cassel@linaro.org>

On 2018-05-21 13:43, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> The following problem was observed when running iperf:
[...]
> 
> In order to avoid trying to flush the queue every time we free a frame,
> only do this when there are 3 or less frames pending, and while we
> actually have frames in the queue. This logic was copied from
> mt76_txq_schedule (mt76), one of few other drivers that are actually
> using wake_tx_queue.
> 
> Suggested-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
> ---
> Changes since V1: use READ_ONCE() to disallow the compiler
> optimizing things in undesirable ways.
> 
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
> index cda164f6e9f6..264cf0bd5c00 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ int ath10k_txrx_tx_unref(struct ath10k_htt *htt,
>  		wake_up(&htt->empty_tx_wq);
>  	spin_unlock_bh(&htt->tx_lock);
> 
> +	if (READ_ONCE(htt->num_pending_tx) <= 3 && !list_empty(&ar->txqs))
> +		ath10k_mac_tx_push_pending(ar);
> +
Niklas,

Sorry for the late response. ath10k_mac_tx_push_pending is already 
called
at the end of NAPI handler. Isn't that enough to process pending frames?

Earlier we observed performance issues in calling push_pending from each
tx completion. IMHO this change may introduce the same problem again.

-Rajkumar

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-21 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-21 20:43 [PATCH v2] ath10k: transmit queued frames after waking queues Niklas Cassel
2018-05-21 23:11 ` Rajkumar Manoharan [this message]
2018-05-22 21:15   ` Niklas Cassel
2018-05-22 22:16     ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-05-23 16:25     ` Erik Stromdahl
2018-05-23 18:05       ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-05-23 22:44       ` Niklas Cassel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8195be7603a8cd659d25a9c3d898b891@codeaurora.org \
    --to=rmanohar@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.cassel@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).