From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Caleb Cushing Subject: Re: large packet loss take2 2.6.31.x Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:21:17 -0500 Message-ID: <81bfc67a0911130921j136ec7e7m59bc47e28df5f2e@mail.gmail.com> References: <81bfc67a0911111448q2e7938fcq18adf2454d6bc8f1@mail.gmail.com> <20091112113836.GA7963@ff.dom.local> <81bfc67a0911120546g26627ac5q5860d85f446b29bb@mail.gmail.com> <4AFC5C58.9030207@gmail.com> <81bfc67a0911130825o6d9b93b2he70677157ad889f2@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Frans Pop , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jarek Poplawski Return-path: Received: from mail-yx0-f187.google.com ([209.85.210.187]:62676 "EHLO mail-yx0-f187.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753193AbZKMR0n (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:26:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <81bfc67a0911130825o6d9b93b2he70677157ad889f2@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: any specific switches I should run tcpdump with? or any other tests I should be trying while capturing? (on either end). -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com