From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
dev@openvswitch.org, ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>, Oz Shlomo <ozsh@nvidia.com>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>,
Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 net-next 2/5] openvswitch: return NF_ACCEPT when OVS_CT_NAT is net set in info nat
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:32:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <834a564cfccd63c3700003d3f9986136a3350d63.1669138256.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1669138256.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Either OVS_CT_SRC_NAT or OVS_CT_DST_NAT is set, OVS_CT_NAT must be
set in info->nat. Thus, if OVS_CT_NAT is not set in info->nat, it
will definitely not do NAT but returns NF_ACCEPT in ovs_ct_nat().
This patch changes nothing funcational but only makes this return
earlier in ovs_ct_nat() to keep consistent with TC's processing
in tcf_ct_act_nat().
Reviewed-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
---
net/openvswitch/conntrack.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
index 4c5e5a6475af..cc643a556ea1 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
@@ -816,6 +816,9 @@ static int ovs_ct_nat(struct net *net, struct sw_flow_key *key,
enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype;
int err;
+ if (!(info->nat & OVS_CT_NAT))
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
+
/* Add NAT extension if not confirmed yet. */
if (!nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct) && !nf_ct_nat_ext_add(ct))
return NF_ACCEPT; /* Can't NAT. */
@@ -825,8 +828,7 @@ static int ovs_ct_nat(struct net *net, struct sw_flow_key *key,
* Make sure new expected connections (IP_CT_RELATED) are NATted only
* when committing.
*/
- if (info->nat & OVS_CT_NAT && ctinfo != IP_CT_NEW &&
- ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK &&
+ if (ctinfo != IP_CT_NEW && ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK &&
(ctinfo != IP_CT_RELATED || info->commit)) {
/* NAT an established or related connection like before. */
if (CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo) == IP_CT_DIR_REPLY)
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-22 17:32 [PATCHv2 net-next 0/5] net: eliminate the duplicate code in the ct nat functions of ovs and tc Xin Long
2022-11-22 17:32 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 1/5] openvswitch: delete the unncessary skb_pull_rcsum call in ovs_ct_nat_execute Xin Long
2022-11-22 17:32 ` Xin Long [this message]
2022-11-23 14:24 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 2/5] openvswitch: return NF_ACCEPT when OVS_CT_NAT is net set in info nat Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-11-22 17:32 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 3/5] net: sched: return NF_ACCEPT when fails to add nat ext in tcf_ct_act_nat Xin Long
2022-11-23 14:23 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-12-01 16:53 ` Xin Long
2022-11-22 17:32 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 4/5] net: sched: update the nat flag for icmp error packets in ct_nat_execute Xin Long
2022-11-22 17:32 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 5/5] net: move the nat function to nf_nat_ovs for ovs and tc Xin Long
2022-11-23 15:09 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-11-23 15:13 ` [ovs-dev] " Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-11-23 17:31 ` Xin Long
2022-11-23 18:48 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-11-23 18:54 ` Xin Long
2022-11-23 19:17 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-11-23 19:55 ` Xin Long
2022-11-23 21:21 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-11-23 21:34 ` Xin Long
2022-12-01 21:37 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-11-24 10:00 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-11-23 18:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-12-01 16:26 ` Xin Long
2022-11-23 12:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 0/5] net: eliminate the duplicate code in the ct nat functions of " Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=834a564cfccd63c3700003d3f9986136a3350d63.1669138256.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ovs-dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=ozsh@nvidia.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=paulb@nvidia.com \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).