From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Zigit Zo" <zuozhijie@bytedance.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
leitao@debian.org, sdf@fomichev.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netpoll: prevent hanging NAPI when netcons gets enabled
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 14:23:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <837ee1c6-a7c8-490b-84ae-6c24fdd48e4e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250725024454.690517-1-kuba@kernel.org>
On 7/25/25 4:44 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Paolo spotted hangs in NIPA running driver tests against virtio.
> The tests hang in virtnet_close() -> virtnet_napi_tx_disable().
>
> The problem is only reproducible if running multiple of our tests
> in sequence (I used TEST_PROGS="xdp.py ping.py netcons_basic.sh \
> netpoll_basic.py stats.py"). Initial suspicion was that this is
> a simple case of double-disable of NAPI, but instrumenting the
> code reveals:
>
> Deadlocked on NAPI ffff888007cd82c0 (virtnet_poll_tx):
> state: 0x37, disabled: false, owner: 0, listed: false, weight: 64
>
> The NAPI was not in fact disabled, owner is 0 (rather than -1),
> so the NAPI "thinks" it's scheduled for CPU 0 but it's not listed
> (!list_empty(&n->poll_list)). It seems odd that normal NAPI
> processing would wedge itself like this.
>
> My suspicion is that netpoll gets enabled while NAPI is polling,
> and also grab the NAPI instance. This confuses napi_complete_done():
>
> [netpoll] [normal NAPI]
> napi_poll()
> have = netpoll_poll_lock()
> rcu_access_pointer(dev->npinfo)
> return NULL # no netpoll
> __napi_poll()
> ->poll(->weight)
> poll_napi()
> cmpxchg(->poll_owner, -1, cpu)
> poll_one_napi()
> set_bit(NAPI_STATE_NPSVC, ->state)
> napi_complete_done()
> if (NAPIF_STATE_NPSVC)
> return false
> # exit without clearing SCHED
>
> This seems very unlikely, but perhaps virtio has some interactions
> with the hypervisor in the NAPI -> poll that makes the race window
> large?
>
> Best I could to to prove the theory was to add and trigger this
> warning in napi_poll (just before netpoll_poll_unlock()):
>
> WARN_ONCE(!have && rcu_access_pointer(n->dev->npinfo) &&
> napi_is_scheduled(n) && list_empty(&n->poll_list),
> "NAPI race with netpoll %px", n);
>
> If this warning hits the next virtio_close() will hang.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Reported-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/c5a93ed1-9abe-4880-a3bb-8d1678018b1d@redhat.com
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
It's not clear to me if you have been able to validate the patch into
NIPA already?
> ---
> Looks like this is not a new bug, rather Breno's tests now put
> enough pressure on netpoll + virtio to trigger it.
>
> CC: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> CC: Zigit Zo <zuozhijie@bytedance.com>
> CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> CC: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> CC: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
>
> CC: leitao@debian.org
> CC: sdf@fomichev.me
> ---
> drivers/net/netconsole.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> index e3722de08ea9..9bc748ff5752 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> @@ -256,6 +256,24 @@ static struct netconsole_target *alloc_and_init(void)
> return nt;
> }
>
> +static int netconsole_setup_and_enable(struct netconsole_target *nt)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = netpoll_setup(&nt->np);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Make sure all NAPI polls which started before dev->npinfo
> + * was visible have exited before we start calling NAPI poll.
> + * NAPI skips locking if dev->npinfo is NULL.
> + */
> + synchronize_rcu();
I'm wondering if it would make any sense to move the above in
netpoll_setup(), make the exposed symbol safe.
In any case, AFAICS this at very least addresses a real race.
Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-25 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-25 2:44 [PATCH net] netpoll: prevent hanging NAPI when netcons gets enabled Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-25 12:23 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2025-07-25 14:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-25 14:57 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=837ee1c6-a7c8-490b-84ae-6c24fdd48e4e@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zuozhijie@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox