public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Zigit Zo" <zuozhijie@bytedance.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	leitao@debian.org, sdf@fomichev.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netpoll: prevent hanging NAPI when netcons gets enabled
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 14:23:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <837ee1c6-a7c8-490b-84ae-6c24fdd48e4e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250725024454.690517-1-kuba@kernel.org>

On 7/25/25 4:44 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Paolo spotted hangs in NIPA running driver tests against virtio.
> The tests hang in virtnet_close() -> virtnet_napi_tx_disable().
> 
> The problem is only reproducible if running multiple of our tests
> in sequence (I used TEST_PROGS="xdp.py ping.py netcons_basic.sh \
> netpoll_basic.py stats.py"). Initial suspicion was that this is
> a simple case of double-disable of NAPI, but instrumenting the
> code reveals:
> 
>  Deadlocked on NAPI ffff888007cd82c0 (virtnet_poll_tx):
>    state: 0x37, disabled: false, owner: 0, listed: false, weight: 64
> 
> The NAPI was not in fact disabled, owner is 0 (rather than -1),
> so the NAPI "thinks" it's scheduled for CPU 0 but it's not listed
> (!list_empty(&n->poll_list)). It seems odd that normal NAPI
> processing would wedge itself like this.
> 
> My suspicion is that netpoll gets enabled while NAPI is polling,
> and also grab the NAPI instance. This confuses napi_complete_done():
> 
>   [netpoll]                                   [normal NAPI]
>                                         napi_poll()
>                                           have = netpoll_poll_lock()
>                                             rcu_access_pointer(dev->npinfo)
>                                               return NULL # no netpoll
>                                           __napi_poll()
> 					    ->poll(->weight)
>   poll_napi()
>     cmpxchg(->poll_owner, -1, cpu)
>       poll_one_napi()
>         set_bit(NAPI_STATE_NPSVC, ->state)
>                                               napi_complete_done()
>                                                 if (NAPIF_STATE_NPSVC)
>                                                   return false
>                                            # exit without clearing SCHED
> 
> This seems very unlikely, but perhaps virtio has some interactions
> with the hypervisor in the NAPI -> poll that makes the race window
> large?
> 
> Best I could to to prove the theory was to add and trigger this
> warning in napi_poll (just before netpoll_poll_unlock()):
> 
>       WARN_ONCE(!have && rcu_access_pointer(n->dev->npinfo) &&
>                 napi_is_scheduled(n) && list_empty(&n->poll_list),
>                 "NAPI race with netpoll %px", n);
> 
> If this warning hits the next virtio_close() will hang.
> 
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Reported-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/c5a93ed1-9abe-4880-a3bb-8d1678018b1d@redhat.com
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

It's not clear to me if you have been able to validate the patch into
NIPA already?


> ---
> Looks like this is not a new bug, rather Breno's tests now put
> enough pressure on netpoll + virtio to trigger it.
> 
> CC: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> CC: Zigit Zo <zuozhijie@bytedance.com>
> CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> CC: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> CC: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> 
> CC: leitao@debian.org
> CC: sdf@fomichev.me
> ---
>  drivers/net/netconsole.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> index e3722de08ea9..9bc748ff5752 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> @@ -256,6 +256,24 @@ static struct netconsole_target *alloc_and_init(void)
>  	return nt;
>  }
>  
> +static int netconsole_setup_and_enable(struct netconsole_target *nt)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = netpoll_setup(&nt->np);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Make sure all NAPI polls which started before dev->npinfo
> +	 * was visible have exited before we start calling NAPI poll.
> +	 * NAPI skips locking if dev->npinfo is NULL.
> +	 */
> +	synchronize_rcu();

I'm wondering if it would make any sense to move the above in
netpoll_setup(), make the exposed symbol safe.

In any case, AFAICS this at very least addresses a real race.

Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-25 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-25  2:44 [PATCH net] netpoll: prevent hanging NAPI when netcons gets enabled Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-25 12:23 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2025-07-25 14:14   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-25 14:57     ` Breno Leitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=837ee1c6-a7c8-490b-84ae-6c24fdd48e4e@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zuozhijie@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox