From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:52:50 +0200
Message-ID: <84144f020910290652n2e75827dk698b238b6bd1cbed@mail.gmail.com>
References: <200910291212.41656.bzolnier@gmail.com>
	 <200910291345.05888.bzolnier@gmail.com>
	 <20091029.055901.24976117.davem@davemloft.net>
	 <200910291435.54203.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linville@tuxdriver.com
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1754164AbZJ2Nwt@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200910291435.54203.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Hi Bart,

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm saying that you should work with John to have him send a revert or
>> whatever to me.
>
> This is your responsibility to deal with your downstream maintainers,
> not mine and since you have accepted John's patch I'm asking you to
> revert rt2800pci patch from your tree.

So why don't you just send a patch to fix it up? I see you're doing
lots of cleanups to the staging drivers, why not direct some of that
energy to the drivers/net/wireless ones?

                         Pekka