From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brandon Black Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MSG_WAITFORONE flag to recvmmsg Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:55:18 -0500 Message-ID: <84621a61003261555q2c78f6a8o5b438113bed6bd2@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100326223530.GA11817@xpc.home> <1269643470.2256.17.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ulrich Drepper , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1269643470.2256.17.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Eric Dumazet = wrote: > Hmmm, no need to test !datagram, just do : > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0++datagrams; > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0if (flags & MSG_WAITFORONE) > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0flags |=3D MSG= _DONTWAIT; > Ok. I've never been through this process before. Do I resubmit a new subject/thread with the changed patch and [PATCH v2] at this point? Any other nits about how the patch was sent before I do? Thanks, -- Brandon