From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net sched act_vlan: VLAN action rewrite to use RCU lock/unlock and update Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 08:28:24 -0400 Message-ID: <85746b06-ef33-d6f1-b831-8bbaee5b1b26@mojatatu.com> References: <1507689219-22993-1-git-send-email-manish.kurup@verizon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: aring@mojatatu.com, mrv@mojatatu.com, manish.kurup@verizon.com To: Manish Kurup , xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1507689219-22993-1-git-send-email-manish.kurup@verizon.com> Content-Language: en-GB Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 17-10-10 10:33 PM, Manish Kurup wrote: > Using a spinlock in the VLAN action causes performance issues when the VLAN > action is used on multiple cores. Rewrote the VLAN action to use RCU read > locking for reads and updates instead. > > Signed-off-by: Manish Kurup Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim cheers, jamal