Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] net: hsr: require valid EOT supervision TLV

[Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>]

On April 1, 2026 11:52:02 AM GMT+02:00, Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de> wrote:
>On 4/1/26 11:23 AM, luka.gejak@linux.dev wrote:
>> From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
>> 
>> Supervision frames are only valid if terminated with a zero-length EOT
>> TLV. The current check fails to reject non-EOT entries as the terminal
>> TLV, potentially allowing malformed supervision traffic.
>> 
>> Fix this by strictly requiring the terminal TLV to be HSR_TLV_EOT
>> with a length of zero.
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Felix Maurer <fmaurer@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
>> ---
>
>Hi,
>
>This has not been reviewed by Felix. Felix provided his Reviewed-by tag for the v1 which was completely different than this.
>
>Revisions of this patch:
>
>v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260329112313.17164-4-luka.gejak@linux.dev/
>
>v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260326154715.38405-4-luka.gejak@linux.dev/
>
>v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260324143503.187642-4-luka.gejak@linux.dev/
>
>Are these contributions LLM/AI generated? I believe so based on the email history.
>
>AI generated review on rtl8723bs: https://lore.kernel.org/all/B2394A3C-25FD-4CEA-8557-3E68F1F60357@linux.dev/
>
>Another AI generated review on rtl8723bs: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3831D599-655E-40B2-9E5D-9DF956013088@linux.dev/
>
>Likely an AI generated review on a 1 year old HSR patch: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DHFG26KI6L23.1YCOVQ5SSYMO5@linux.dev/
>
>If these are indeed, AI generated contributions or reviews they should be disclosed beforehand. Also there is the Assisted-by: tag. Also note that developer must take full responsibility for the contribution which means understanding it completely.
>
>https://docs.kernel.org/process/coding-assistants.html#signed-off-by-and-developer-certificate-of-origin
>
>Thanks,
>Fernando.

Hi Fernando,
About the Reviewed-by tag, that was my mistake. I forgot to remove it 
when rebasing. And about AI. I’ve been using it to help format my 
emails and translate them into English since it isn't my native 
language. However, the technical logic and the code itself are my own 
work, written without AI. Should I send v5, and if so, what should I 
do besides stripping the Reviewed-by tag? I've read the documentation 
on coding assistants you linked and will make sure to follow it on the
next revision.
Best regards,
Luka Gejak