From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: print error message in phy_error
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 19:11:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85c68d40-e539-f619-845e-4bf7ed24dcce@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7bf642ef-4f41-c251-8ffe-bf2664c98c57@gmail.com>
On 16.12.2018 18:55, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 12/16/18 à 9:16 AM, Heiner Kallweit a écrit :
>> On 16.12.2018 18:02, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Le 12/16/18 à 7:52 AM, Heiner Kallweit a écrit :
>>>> So far phy_error() silently stops the PHY state machine. If the network
>>>> driver doesn't inform about a MDIO error then the user may wonder why
>>>> his network is down. So let's inform the user.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Kind of similar to the netdev watchdog on a TX timeout, I wonder if we
>>> should not just put a WARN() here to get a complete stack trace to help
>>> debug those events?
>>>
>> AFAICS phy_error() is always (?) caused by a MDIO access error.
>> Does it help us to know in which code path the MDIO error occurred?
>
> I would say yes because if you have things like nested MDIO bus accesses
> (as can happen with Ethernet switches/DSA) or if runtime PM got in the
> way, you would be able to know that.
>
Good, convinced. So I'll provide a v2.
>>
>> And maybe the stack trace in case of a tx timeout isn't the best
>> example, at least from my personal experience. I dealt with such cases
>> and the stack trace never helped. The root cause always was in a totally
>> different place (wrong chip tx configuration etc.)
>> But maybe there are other cases where it's useful.
>
> That is entirely true, debugging TX timeouts is definitively no fun and
> the watchdog does not help at all, other than making users scream and
> shout :)
>
>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 2 ++
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
>>>> index 890ae1d73..a898fa411 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
>>>> @@ -739,6 +739,8 @@ static void phy_error(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>>> phydev->state = PHY_HALTED;
>>>> mutex_unlock(&phydev->lock);
>>>>
>>>> + phydev_err(phydev, "stopping PHY state machine due to error\n");
>>>> +
>>>> phy_trigger_machine(phydev);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-16 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-16 15:52 [PATCH net-next] net: phy: print error message in phy_error Heiner Kallweit
2018-12-16 16:48 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-12-16 17:02 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-12-16 17:16 ` Heiner Kallweit
2018-12-16 17:55 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-12-16 18:11 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2018-12-16 17:19 ` Heiner Kallweit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85c68d40-e539-f619-845e-4bf7ed24dcce@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox