From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grygorii Strashko Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] RFC CPSW switchdev mode Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 17:59:52 -0500 Message-ID: <85eb9f54-a4de-969e-4658-38878d481292@ti.com> References: <1527144984-31236-1-git-send-email-ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org> <4277c55c-bea2-1061-35e9-62d1d0f60d28@ti.com> <20180602140833.GA8574@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ilias Apalodimas , , , , , , , , To: Andrew Lunn Return-path: Received: from lelnx194.ext.ti.com ([198.47.27.80]:24496 "EHLO lelnx194.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752365AbeFEXAD (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2018 19:00:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180602140833.GA8574@lunn.ch> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/02/2018 09:08 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 04:29:08PM -0500, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >> Hi Ilias, > > >> Second, Thanks a lot for your great work. I'm still testing it with different >> use cases and trying to consolidate my reply for all questions. >> >> All, thanks for your comments. > > Hi Grygorii > > Something i've said to Ilias already. I would recommend you don't try > to cover all your uses cases with the first version. Keep it simple > and clean, don't do anything controversial and get it merged. Then add > more features one by one. We can then discuss any odd ball features > while being able to look at the complete system, driver, switchdev and > the network stack. > yes. It definitely no problem from my side, except basic customer use-cases simply not working without sw0p0, at least with current LKML :( And I just have to look a little bit in the future as selected approach expected to be extended on future SoC (and other parts of existing SoCs - ICSS-G SW switch) where we going to have more features, like TSN, EST and packet Policing and Classification. And I very, very appreciated for your (and all others) time and comments. Thank you. -- regards, -grygorii