From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
To: Chenguang Zhao <chenguang.zhao@linux.dev>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org,
kerneljasonxing@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Chenguang Zhao <zhaochenguang@kylinos.cn>,
syzbot+2b120190d9e54ad8c65d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: fix infinite loop with ipvlan L3 from unconditional ipvs_property clear
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 11:10:54 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8609d29f-750d-ef73-8df4-3ebf540b0892@ssi.bg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928065550.GA620427@pc>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3031 bytes --]
Hello,
On Mon, 28 Sep 2026, Chenguang Zhao wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 03:42:42PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 02:33:12PM +0800, Chenguang Zhao wrote:
> > > From: Chenguang Zhao <zhaochenguang@kylinos.cn>
> > >
> > > Commit de2c211868b9 ("ipvs: Always clear ipvs_property flag in
> > > skb_scrub_packet()") moved ipvs_reset() before the xnet check, making
> > > the call unconditional. The intent was to fix a bpf_redirect case where
> > > stale ipvs_property on an skb re-entering the RX path caused the SNAT
> > > hook to be skipped. However the change is too broad: when IPVS NAT
> > > sits above an ipvlan L3 interface in the same netns, the following
> > > loop happens:
> > >
> > > LOCAL_OUT -> IPVS DNAT (sets ipvs_property=1) -> dst_output -> ipvlan
> > > -> skb_scrub_packet() -> ipvs_reset() clears the flag
> > > -> ipvlan_process_v4_outbound() -> ip_local_out() -> LOCAL_OUT
> > > -> IPVS sees ipvs_property=0, processes again -> infinite recursion
> > >
> > > syzbot reported this as a stack overflow on a KASAN kernel where each
> > > level burns ~3.3 KB of stack and XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT falls short. On
> > > non-KASAN kernels the dead-loop detector catches it and prints "Dead
> > > loop on virtual device", but traffic is still broken.
> > >
> > > Fixes: de2c211868b9 ("ipvs: Always clear ipvs_property flag in skb_scrub_packet()")
> > > Reported-by: syzbot+2b120190d9e54ad8c65d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2b120190d9e54ad8c65d
> > > Signed-off-by: Chenguang Zhao <zhaochenguang@kylinos.cn>
> >
> > 1. You need to copy IPVS maintainers on patches related to IPVS. Added
> > Julian.
>
> Thanks, will add Julian to CC in v2.
I saw it the first time, not needed. But I was busy
with other changes, sorry for that. May be the packet scrubing
needs 3 states, not just 2. But as this is not my area I have
to dig more. SCRUB_REROUTE/SCRUB_TUNNEL (xdev=false, no ipvs_reset)
used by IPVLAN L3, SCRUB_FORWARD (xdev=false, ipvs_reset) used
by bpf_redirect in same netns, SCRUB_NET (xdev=true). But there
are many call sites to check. The problem is to know how far
a packet can reach without reset.
Another option is to add new skb_scrub_packet_XXX() for the
needed sites, I'm not sure. But adding IPVS code in the IP layer
does not look nice.
> >
> > 2. Does it reproduce with commit 7f1de03e3103 ("net: reduce
> > XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT under KASAN") in net-next?
>
> The dead loop itself still reproduces — dmesg shows "Dead loop on virtual device" for
> every connection, and IPVS InPkts keeps climbing. But the stack overflow crash does not
> reproduce with 7f1de03e3103 on KASAN, since the lower recursion limit catches the loop
> before the stack blows up. So 7f1de03e3103 turns the panic into a packet drop,
> which is expected, but doesn't fix the underlying issue (ipvs_property being cleared
> unconditionally in skb_scrub_packet).
>
> Thanks
> Chenguang
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 6:33 [PATCH net] ipvs: fix infinite loop with ipvlan L3 from unconditional ipvs_property clear Chenguang Zhao
2026-09-25 12:42 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-09-28 6:55 ` Chenguang Zhao
2026-09-28 8:10 ` Julian Anastasov [this message]
2026-09-26 20:12 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci
2026-09-28 6:58 ` [PATCH net] " netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8609d29f-750d-ef73-8df4-3ebf540b0892@ssi.bg \
--to=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=chenguang.zhao@linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+2b120190d9e54ad8c65d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=zhaochenguang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox