From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom St Denis Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 19:40:49 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <861997288.94032.1358728848956.JavaMail.root@elliptictech.com> References: <20130121003441.GA19447@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Dillow , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt To: Borislav Petkov Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130121003441.GA19447@pd.tnic> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Borislav Petkov" > To: "Steven Rostedt" > Cc: "Tom St Denis" , "David Dillow" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, > netdev@vger.kernel.org > Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 7:34:41 PM > Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 05:54:07PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > My God, you sound like a 2 year old. > > > > Suck it up, and do the fixes. It's not the time you are worried > > about, > > as you most definitely spent more time bitching to everyone than it > > would have taken you to clean up your work. > > It's like you're reading my mind... :-) The problem is for me to add the ()'s is a no brainer. For me to re-write complete statements for coding style reasons means I have to actually go out and test it again. In a proper IPsec lab that can take a couple of hours to make sure it's been run through its paces. That's [among other things] the problem I have. Re-writing perfectly good code because it doesn't meet coding "standards" that nobody else seems to match. If you guys can't appreciate that I should just bow out of the discussion. I didn't come here looking for a fight I came here to seek reason. Tom