From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Wragg Subject: Re: [PATCH net] geneve: Refine MTU limit Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:41:17 +0000 Message-ID: <86fuwq2cpe.fsf@weave.works> References: <1455625999-9781-1-git-send-email-david@weave.works> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: David Wragg , Linux Kernel Network Developers , ovs dev , Tom Herbert To: Jesse Gross Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:33840 "EHLO mail-wm0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946232AbcBRQlT (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:41:19 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id b205so33320967wmb.1 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:41:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Jesse Gross's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:32:15 -0800") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jesse Gross writes: > In addition to Tom's comment about taking into account > dev->hard_header_len, can you please not include > GENEVE_MAX_OPTIONS_LEN in the MTU calculation based on the discussion > on the other thread? Otherwise, you are excluding some potentially > valid configurations. Addressed in v2. David