From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDE1C433EF for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:06:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231364AbiD0LKF (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2022 07:10:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49186 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232426AbiD0LJr (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2022 07:09:47 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABBC73D1EF for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 04:06:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id g19so2520799lfv.2 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 04:06:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=gfvLeYqHPQ+5/le1PQ5m8ByHdZe6xucvGKDboobiRU0=; b=IEONqacXGW4d4Shh0BedSQpSclgh5MPONe0xR8HELE1uME7x+KvZxhBOG0ICrBBtYe bh1lZGb5XU9VKtGgqmX17tk1jEPz11XnlFAnqyV2QA0tQmqxCWiqri+XMFBTJ5chj2Ke leWhFrYyrAQFu8R/mOMVZXcp67I3Ek+z11kNyZshDPS5YV7XX0x/FhMrNLlZL7sIAcpF MrU4pL0ZOZmJrzCsiKKOg8jLjzGN4hE6o+lVcb0H12vY8+yGYYW/JEtEPjvVPGLlJXxV P44OvM7Vkv9t+gPBiq2SD5hgL225lqaINSdUXNzZW500vpRDhzre4CQwcKabnsWhpCfP kTXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=gfvLeYqHPQ+5/le1PQ5m8ByHdZe6xucvGKDboobiRU0=; b=jc9TU6XVunktN/UQasE544kNlQbZAmJZIFJbnQIan6gODfwEQ3wZJ6bObzw1iv7IvH BQcHXaMYqCKr9Yq7Ko6SCwdyQElJq5mmK/thy1UYRCuuFnAftkPZZmdvxw3wNr1/Wsq1 sEgyhnaEPdg5nNM8K+mU+QvJWPsb3r+s4vUORRyQ+Yun3IPTKwkiL7KvBzTZ/WdXn06p oNKUCjnuE5tjQlH3FVQEu7NXpKp6RVZASdQeSLs/Pi/ccQEiXGpRK8GuftllIjVjsSDZ npvk9pfFl56Q5/lznB92RbVmDSWk2sKrRSdfhqKDQiRIfJEVSMggijJB7FDv35BbU3ic fMow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531q92y1IuqULqkXwViyTFamcW/8yJzpTMjL/p68pbHhxd2lmyEw XOZuCTnJdiv0cpNr154sR2k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwL+DjvGRDTfiZaady0aDXdgUi4OkzGrOGL16MolRzvWR1QPFaJTzFIXeydZXiO/ycCbxD6zA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:694:b0:471:8eae:8c13 with SMTP id t20-20020a056512069400b004718eae8c13mr19889549lfe.37.1651057594884; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 04:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wse-c0127 (2-104-116-184-cable.dk.customer.tdc.net. [2.104.116.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d14-20020a05651c088e00b0024daf492556sm1772408ljq.131.2022.04.27.04.06.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Apr 2022 04:06:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Hans Schultz X-Google-Original-From: Hans Schultz To: Vladimir Oltean , Hans Schultz Cc: Andrew Lunn , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Jakub Kicinski , "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Vivien Didelot , Vladimir Oltean , Kurt Kanzenbach , Hauke Mehrtens , Woojung Huh , "UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com" , Sean Wang , Landen Chao , DENG Qingfang , Claudiu Manoil , Alexandre Belloni , Linus Walleij , Alvin =?utf-8?Q?=C5=A0ipraga?= , George McCollister Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 07/10] net: dsa: request drivers to perform FDB isolation In-Reply-To: <20220427103209.luyfereepqaha7dw@skbuf> References: <20220225092225.594851-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> <20220225092225.594851-8-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> <867d7bga78.fsf@gmail.com> <20220426231755.7yhvabefzbyiaj4o@skbuf> <86ilquapl1.fsf@gmail.com> <20220427103209.luyfereepqaha7dw@skbuf> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 13:06:32 +0200 Message-ID: <86zgk6eqfb.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On ons, apr 27, 2022 at 10:32, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:38:18AM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote: >> >> I see that there is definitions for 64bit mac addresses out there, which >> might also be needed to be supported at some point? > > I don't know about 64-bit MAC addresses, do you have more information? > I have only seen that there is a section about it in rfc7043: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7043 and some in rfc7042 also.