From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f47.google.com (mail-ej1-f47.google.com [209.85.218.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76D713C9FE for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 20:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.47 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709238482; cv=none; b=Cpd/6vBs7Jvh5ZHbcBY43/INR1vGO4i/AuoAAfyPhZn8lm8eSqiXc3flQUAnycR8VN0I4NJWiZENcZoRB5Ls7RRa4FmE05hI0FtHsbTUVHwjxG668TN0Lse6NbpZ9DK1ccAPBM3ImBa8Cg++SvpHi+Yp5fxxpUVNj1UIbuSEhzQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709238482; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RDsR4ToFpRNThOky+HJxH98rH88NIDQxJa03Zgfpnqg=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=P9bkzeFL7iwW9TumB+iAUxWnYfzRF0wVtLY0Il7CpMl9eh7H4+NtLP8iH2AcJz7oQuWbcrxxU9TrfH4WIZrwz1a9KnEUAGi2c5Ia748x0CM2yebsgxiUqpAKlVVaXap+XkoK+YlPM20PBFl7Kk9uGkm5hOYEGA4gNV8tkpcyJlg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=cloudflare.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cloudflare.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com header.i=@cloudflare.com header.b=FSbX/ND1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.47 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=cloudflare.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cloudflare.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com header.i=@cloudflare.com header.b="FSbX/ND1" Received: by mail-ej1-f47.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a4429c556efso238483666b.0 for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:27:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google09082023; t=1709238478; x=1709843278; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to:from :user-agent:references:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DZcR+0yv09X8AgyLuxWH7iCyYgNb+H9Qm3haz1AXF1E=; b=FSbX/ND1RSFg1XD0nhVbxsljXSGAvGIj+7f0miEmMGL7zcWUNZQWQ70jHggSADRp8J dLMFtqHIQIQwNrMed9Q4DQyGgjsKFnwIDsS/fkD04llSzsm3vlkrgVmU8FBQWOrO4gA7 1RndLdKKvOnDHhconknl3unPhTovQuE2x+AP6QS1EJLzXbllR8BvfCorwBWqlHleLXS9 419Bhyw2NG6ziPblkL3tIa+8oJQgGq5OBuT5lzWZRYePQQ6ZxCSeMvZI61OFdK4lL38S qnjgbj9cStiA2tvT3fZUcHyv1lCk4Fp0m8iaANld0DcqM+oqCzv8tr3hFg7iMrWMmGQk jMgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709238478; x=1709843278; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to:from :user-agent:references:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=DZcR+0yv09X8AgyLuxWH7iCyYgNb+H9Qm3haz1AXF1E=; b=Bh9+yXfWK/ZLk4RpBIR1MST3yE3dkN8sG1YqkqATZFq5fSRBe+lp52S/D9bnO4KoWx TzwN/Bok+41bwCRDYtOx/GOx1DTglEbS0t7Zx0kh+EyUkF2GScaJ8zCeR44rcBFMjfFm fvH+vHCLFiFpB0TEmpLfWk1WLKjh65x4je5Yk65E3tFCDRlnQ/tFjKnegkYjsTauDg4e OOnt09IiH2V0L+KGNXmYJ0jrTedD6Ncxh8zvVzItfLxcn+As03R/ZWx4SGh/GbmTwWu4 vZGdJV80qCUUhYGmSzefDr9OUQThcdzs8B2LscI6Mwsl2VhRNx5g9oIoUTmyliT++X5Y h1DQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX6iVAPEPNmBkNgBSUwhSRaA5D6jP4Qc6+NcvFLWbvP4xU8dhwn6/U3JVS2hCHj1G9pIvG0PDNWeraRzThT4opgmo1pxrd9 X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx4QYBO2KjweWaOWw2VppTKSiFnuSq1RckeY66y3gUsKAXKq5DX dDdWvgd6h/CjDXL4OXZb52xN4QTQb7YHkPqZSku2GxyKNrB2PYtaKhKcgOVS8Z0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG1YXaMCPYFP4ybh7Rx5xqWqA1BhyLNOKCSuLhH0a9+11clFB7+JHSCwlsHnhgI7bgLYfpXPw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3c4e:b0:a44:7209:4c94 with SMTP id i14-20020a1709063c4e00b00a4472094c94mr46779ejg.14.1709238478243; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:27:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from cloudflare.com (79.184.121.65.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl. [79.184.121.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id vg9-20020a170907d30900b00a4439b7756bsm1005844ejc.6.2024.02.29.12.27.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:27:57 -0800 (PST) References: <20240229005920.2407409-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20240229005920.2407409-13-kuba@kernel.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 29.2 From: Jakub Sitnicki To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, mic@digikod.net, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Xin Long Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] selftests: ip_local_port_range: use XFAIL instead of SKIP Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:19:09 +0100 In-reply-to: <20240229005920.2407409-13-kuba@kernel.org> Message-ID: <871q8vm2wj.fsf@cloudflare.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 04:59 PM -08, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > SCTP does not support IP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE and we know it, > so use XFAIL instead of SKIP. > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski > --- > tools/testing/selftests/net/ip_local_port_range.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ip_local_port_range.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ip_local_port_range.c > index 6ebd58869a63..193b82745fd8 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ip_local_port_range.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ip_local_port_range.c > @@ -365,9 +365,6 @@ TEST_F(ip_local_port_range, late_bind) > __u32 range; > __u16 port; > > - if (variant->so_protocol == IPPROTO_SCTP) > - SKIP(return, "SCTP doesn't support IP_BIND_ADDRESS_NO_PORT"); > - > fd = socket(variant->so_domain, variant->so_type, 0); > ASSERT_GE(fd, 0) TH_LOG("socket failed"); > > @@ -414,6 +411,9 @@ TEST_F(ip_local_port_range, late_bind) > ASSERT_TRUE(!err) TH_LOG("close failed"); > } > > +XFAIL_ADD(ip_local_port_range, ip4_stcp, late_bind); > +XFAIL_ADD(ip_local_port_range, ip6_stcp, late_bind); > + > TEST_F(ip_local_port_range, get_port_range) > { > __u16 lo, hi; [wrt our earlier discussion off-list] You were right, this test succeeds if I delete SKIP for SCTP. Turns out IP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE works for SCTP out of the box after all. What I didn't notice earlier is that sctp_setsockopt() delegates to ip_setsockopt() when level != SOL_SCTP. CC'ing Marcelo & Xin, to confirm that this isn't a problem.