From: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
To: Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@gmail.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
subashab@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] qmi_wwan: Clone the skb when in pass-through mode
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 15:39:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871r93w8l9.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfDRXhraBRXwaDb6T3XMtGpwK=X2hd8+ONWLSmJhQjGurBMmw@mail.gmail.com> (Kristian Evensen's message of "Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:04:02 +0200")
Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:51 PM Kristian Evensen
> <kristian.evensen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think this would be a really nice solution. The same (at least
>> FLAG_MULTI_PACKET + usbnet_skb_return) could be applied to pass
>> through as well, giving us consistent handling of aggregated packets.
>> While we might not save a huge number of lines, I believe the
>> resulting code will be easier to understand.
>
> Apologies for the noise. When I check the code again, I see that as
> long as FLAG_MULTI_PACKET is set, then we end up with usbnet freeing
> the skb (we will always jump to done in rx_process()). So for the
> pass-through case, I believe your initial suggestion of having
> rx_fixup return 1 is the way to go.
Yes, if we are to use FLAG_MULTI_PACKET then we must call
usbnet_skb_return() for all the non-muxed cases. There is no clean way
to enable FLAG_MULTI_PACKET on-demand.
I am fine with either solution. Whatever Jakub wants :-)
Bjørn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-14 14:18 [PATCH net] qmi_wwan: Clone the skb when in pass-through mode Kristian Evensen
2021-06-14 14:45 ` Bjørn Mork
2021-06-14 15:49 ` Kristian Evensen
2021-06-14 17:02 ` Kristian Evensen
2021-06-14 20:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-06-15 6:24 ` Bjørn Mork
2021-06-15 9:03 ` Kristian Evensen
2021-06-15 10:04 ` Bjørn Mork
2021-06-15 10:51 ` Kristian Evensen
2021-06-15 11:04 ` Kristian Evensen
2021-06-15 13:39 ` Bjørn Mork [this message]
2021-06-15 19:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-06-15 19:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-06-16 10:08 ` Kristian Evensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871r93w8l9.fsf@miraculix.mork.no \
--to=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=kristian.evensen@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=subashab@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox