From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Naja Melan <najamelan@autistici.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ip netns exec hides mount points from child processes
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 13:52:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871s5qdgqj.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3493413-38f8-69a3-6ab8-7ce9610a40e9@autistici.org> (Naja Melan's message of "Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:01:00 +0000")
Naja Melan <najamelan@autistici.org> writes:
> hi,
>
> I have been using network namespaces for a while, mostly with good results. Recently I ran into a problem where the cgroup mount points are missing for software that needs it (runc).
>
> I discovered that ip netns exec creates a mount namespace to bind mount network configuration files. I suppose that not all mount points are propagated to the new mount ns. Is this correct? I'm wondering if this is intended behaviour.
>
> In my case this is unexpected (man page does not mention hiding mount points) and undesired (breaks software I run in different netns). Is there a way around this problem.
>
> Note that bind mounting network configuration files is not a problem in my case, but currently I loose at least:
>
> - all cgroup mounts
> - debugfs
> - configfs
> - pstore
> - sysfs
> - selinuxfs
> - securityfs
>
> Is this a bug, if not is there a way to work around this?
This is mostly unexpected.
The current code creates a mount namespace. Unmounts an old sysfs and
mounts a new sysfs that matches your network namespace. It has to be
root to do all of those things.
Why you don't see the new sysfs is something I need more information to
understand.
Since everything else is mounted on top of sysfs. The code probably
needs an update to bind mount (cgroups, debugfs, configs, pstore,
selinuxfs, and securitfs) from the old sysfs to the new sysfs. That
everything now gets mount points on sysfs is new from the time the code
was written and the code just needs an update for that.
But the we need to understand why sysfs does not show up. That sounds
like a security module meddling, or possibly an attempt to run ip netns
exec in a user namespace.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-05 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-02 19:01 ip netns exec hides mount points from child processes Naja Melan
2019-01-05 19:52 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2019-09-18 16:26 ` Naja Melan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871s5qdgqj.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=najamelan@autistici.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).