From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
Yunsheng Lin <yunshenglin0825@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: zhangkun09@huawei.com, liuyonglong@huawei.com,
fanghaiqing@huawei.com,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 2/8] page_pool: fix timing for checking and disabling napi_local
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 18:13:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8734h8qgmz.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2aa84c61-6531-4f17-89e5-101f46ef00d0@huawei.com>
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> writes:
>> So I really don't see a way for this race to happen with correct usage
>> of the page_pool and NAPI APIs, which means there's no reason to make
>> the change you are proposing here.
>
> I looked at one driver setting pp->napi, it seems the bnxt driver doesn't
> seems to call page_pool_disable_direct_recycling() when unloading, see
> bnxt_half_close_nic(), page_pool_disable_direct_recycling() seems to be
> only called for the new queue_mgmt API:
>
> /* rtnl_lock held, this call can only be made after a previous successful
> * call to bnxt_half_open_nic().
> */
> void bnxt_half_close_nic(struct bnxt *bp)
> {
> bnxt_hwrm_resource_free(bp, false, true);
> bnxt_del_napi(bp); *----call napi del and rcu sync----*
> bnxt_free_skbs(bp);
> bnxt_free_mem(bp, true); *------call page_pool_destroy()----*
> clear_bit(BNXT_STATE_HALF_OPEN, &bp->state);
> }
>
> Even if there is a page_pool_disable_direct_recycling() called between
> bnxt_del_napi() and bnxt_free_mem(), the timing window still exist as
> rcu sync need to be called after page_pool_disable_direct_recycling(),
> it seems some refactor is needed for bnxt driver to reuse the rcu sync
> from the NAPI API, in order to avoid calling the rcu sync for
> page_pool_destroy().
Well, I would consider that usage buggy. A page pool object is created
with a reference to the napi struct; so the page pool should also be
destroyed (clearing its reference) before the napi memory is freed. I
guess this is not really documented anywhere, but it's pretty standard
practice to free objects in the opposite order of their creation.
So no, I don't think this is something that should be fixed on the page
pool side (and certainly not by adding another synchronize_rcu() call
per queue!); rather, we should fix the drivers that get this wrong (and
probably document the requirement a bit better).
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-24 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-10 13:06 [PATCH net-next v7 0/8] fix two bugs related to page_pool Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-10 13:06 ` [PATCH net-next v7 1/8] page_pool: introduce page_pool_get_pp() API Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-10 13:06 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/8] page_pool: fix timing for checking and disabling napi_local Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-10 15:40 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-01-11 5:24 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-14 13:03 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-20 11:24 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-01-22 11:02 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-24 17:13 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2025-01-25 14:21 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-27 13:47 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-02-04 13:51 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-10 13:06 ` [PATCH net-next v7 3/8] page_pool: fix IOMMU crash when driver has already unbound Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-15 16:29 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-01-16 12:52 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-16 16:09 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-01-17 11:56 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-17 16:56 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-01-18 13:36 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-10 13:06 ` [PATCH net-next v7 4/8] page_pool: support unlimited number of inflight pages Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-10 13:06 ` [PATCH net-next v7 5/8] page_pool: skip dma sync operation for " Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-10 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v7 6/8] page_pool: use list instead of ptr_ring for ring cache Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-10 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v7 7/8] page_pool: batch refilling pages to reduce atomic operation Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-10 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v7 8/8] page_pool: use list instead of array for alloc cache Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-14 14:31 ` [PATCH net-next v7 0/8] fix two bugs related to page_pool Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-01-15 11:33 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-15 17:40 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-01-16 12:52 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-16 18:02 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-01-17 11:35 ` Yunsheng Lin
2025-01-18 8:04 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8734h8qgmz.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fanghaiqing@huawei.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yunshenglin0825@gmail.com \
--cc=zhangkun09@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).