From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C531B45038; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706180601; cv=none; b=a9S2AJ9+xkIyVjHiRkOF1yf9n7kJ7KQUvlDluNS7gSaMZYzbq+EtCq3hQJk5/FPXWHhPlfkZ5E+tf6k2DGPsaBUI/0ZmUs1EqzMm6+3KUxCZpfqirE2x2D9l2uPKnPqVJScjcJkA6fBkS2JAhMgBfmwqj4bufpe1qTaAuifEPnw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706180601; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UGg3yUqQ314SNJxAbWSQJNKui6kWSnV25W5yvKL41k0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=a+6dJ7YIgb/AQwaxWcEpt7AN6Uk7aIslv0E8ZAIBnDZdDvyLTAjyAR0zxcxgaoEC3KHQm8tqdi9fMqInsbi3WGGvY7toia3pRyOCKzKy88WI/abqLYePg5F1MIY2rytmRkX1vDN2KZhBfpYTCMIwy/DSrUIbSFGkXXwdChi/qzM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=u3SnLV4P; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=jBv6uUoT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="u3SnLV4P"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="jBv6uUoT" From: Kurt Kanzenbach DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1706180597; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UGg3yUqQ314SNJxAbWSQJNKui6kWSnV25W5yvKL41k0=; b=u3SnLV4PZaCoZGJ3bJ25IlxETtood5AIfwRHarpLIu0DQJKJiE320k6VU1EDkPJ7NBI7Ar 0D+Pg9k2f6KMRYV8Lff57+Y5aQzINaDvDVTZIbLkp/YzfM69+BgeTEDKiOmFjfMAyEfcUK Mjs5UgUYahdJtJsYXpdFYuCX42E5hEjliwPuLNVgAc2mcYbV9Hpku24tAB17brXjx7CkKZ MM6c8qD9QNaqQ2gFBcIpNK3Sb8Ti1z0fzUDZ+MM+vwLm+Dp+QEmWLG7lB2YGhHDHvMiepr 1kIG9HCKfZdAtQeuZp8Rsd55fSrq8vA9XaFT76XXuUSivIUjnyCF4PoNYdBKEQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1706180597; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UGg3yUqQ314SNJxAbWSQJNKui6kWSnV25W5yvKL41k0=; b=jBv6uUoTeqQ7ZIsiv5KNrixbFEaklvqN2Pjq308Ul+wdRoYBuqemFgZS23br5QDL7WfJ/V FloqYx5d/nfnYRDw== To: Esben Haabendal , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Maxime Coquelin Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: stmmac: Time Based Scheduling support for OF platforms In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:03:16 +0100 Message-ID: <8734ulekuj.fsf@kurt.kurt.home> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi, On Wed Jan 24 2024, Esben Haabendal wrote: > This allows enabling TBS for TX queues by adding the > snps,time-based-scheduling property. You should check for support for this > on your particular controller before enabling. Typically, TX queue 0 does > not support TBS. More a general question: Do i see that correctly that Launch Time does not work for OF platforms (such as an imx93) at the moment, because the tbs_en property is not configured? Or why are these patches necessary? Thanks, Kurt --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJSBAEBCgA8FiEEvLm/ssjDfdPf21mSwZPR8qpGc4IFAmWyP/QeHGt1cnQua2Fu emVuYmFjaEBsaW51dHJvbml4LmRlAAoJEMGT0fKqRnOCL50QAJcDSvbiM7O1gNCH paOkpfL04tCHg41ccGCEEDcDNadgMVtdEupNV1xwikf5sNYd44FDXTm6U0ad1J5H Ub8/GbM+rGdz+5fSFRB+C/XX0r9VIhEHZg9QErNO5pTt2syYko2R4LobCvJMiAF7 sGBskqeV/De7CcOkHwin3pjNYIUxAPluKqUnLKubxK9NEVfn9ZL122+5rqFyUAux N8S1KBvFC+QJ2iizSHPmf/99qmeJPbzyWVL10jqXsg5Xs+ZsOes7mVHXUe8x+e6I TVhsP5SO9q4XxHAqiuLoC56svb6MPpg0DOGL/adVOAL0y1YSWfgpLqQ8wjNgpniG jSDJnRL9rY8+VowQx9EtsExAemH2w8xfD71rjwTISJKSIsJskcc7pDb9wc3ck29D xlhhOHgrLgDOfAcHhwM2cQT3ebJD7tQU65yeedjC2hU1rKFXvcT2E7+Ia9cAne+k lxse7NTvbN6joDFwFKlJfCKC2Gs616WhK7tvomnzqzFnqle0bS6psW6ybkyLZvRb 0lDeRdYPcnZj8SpxhV9XFkX1njmNkHNw7gJA5WEMQciLnGE1+IS5aiifXNLlALXA JbaEaQ3qSSivqh6Pa4kb87hGvh6gDRSo9LD8Uw7ViK9yXeSyrdsy8lEX07TbTj5t dwZF0yXrFem0vJsm9MBfjxTJpRZ+ =1RFb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--