From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>,
"Maor Dickman" <maord@nvidia.com>
Subject: cls_flower vlan matching
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 19:26:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8735jkv2nm.fsf@nvidia.com> (raw)
Hi Jiri,
I've been debugging an issue that we encounter with OvS-created rules
for single and double-VLAN packets.
Basically, for flows with single VLAN OvS creates following tc filter:
filter protocol 802.1Q pref 2 flower chain 0
filter protocol 802.1Q pref 2 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
vlan_id 10
vlan_prio 0
vlan_ethtype ip
dst_mac e4:2c:0b:08:00:02
src_mac b8:ce:f6:05:e7:3a
eth_type ipv4
ip_flags nofrag
skip_hw
not_in_hw
action order 1: vlan pop pipe
index 2 ref 1 bind 1 installed 11 sec used 0 sec firstused 10 sec
Action statistics:
Sent 860 bytes 10 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
no_percpu
action order 2: mirred (Egress Redirect to device enp8s0f0_0) stolen
index 2 ref 1 bind 1 installed 11 sec used 0 sec firstused 10 sec
Action statistics:
Sent 860 bytes 10 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
cookie 16a9b603144b3e0c64a887aeb972a269
no_percpu
Such rule also matches packets that have additional second VLAN header,
even though filter has both eth_type and vlan_ethtype set to "ipv4".
Looking at the code this seems to be mostly an artifact of the way
flower uses flow dissector. First, even though looking at the uAPI
eth_type and vlan_ethtype appear like a distinct fields, in flower they
are all mapped to the same key->basic.n_proto. Second, flow dissector
skips following VLAN header as no keys for FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_CVLAN are
set and eventually assigns the value of n_proto to last parsed header.
With these, such filters ignore any headers present between first VLAN
header and first "non magic" header (ipv4 in this case) that doesn't
result FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN.
Is described behavior intentional? Any way to enforce matching for
header following the VLAN header?
Regards,
Vlad
next reply other threads:[~2022-03-14 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-14 17:26 Vlad Buslov [this message]
2022-03-21 11:24 ` cls_flower vlan matching Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8735jkv2nm.fsf@nvidia.com \
--to=vladbu@nvidia.com \
--cc=hadi@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=maord@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).