From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F070CA5A; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:37:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742560644; cv=none; b=VRc8HUS5AQgIaWERgxI3IfMtP+Npzr8QvCczsPuyh28stqT/iKqCsga7YaE84IdhpRMfSQhXzgv2t8RAsVo83szQGIwjXqSI0Q+t5qcT3BEYLgOUBzs2aR2JGImGGyCXL3jV8nsEPphKiI6P0+M/qajBOES607xcs5hvJUd4O6A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742560644; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oQyGiV78LEK+tbLWGXm5etpWS3sUCPu5H0kZTYpo8lU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rRL0rAwAYJa0F5cFSzEqmuTI36+st0l5DSPDKidMrP6AvUNbhLgr6S8S4n9lvKTv+hXkvz0Aet1C8RpVX4UmdIyRsVaGWufuIfqemnbIbtX+L27xrIymi4WNVqW5xIjLE5QiaTaUDfOP4ZedC0r6EJhYZMMBQ6W54BX0V+SV+Nk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=dCNvmiro; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="dCNvmiro" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1742560642; x=1774096642; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=oQyGiV78LEK+tbLWGXm5etpWS3sUCPu5H0kZTYpo8lU=; b=dCNvmiroThBVGoOb5HAHbwY7cdtXwCg98vfZGyuHs6iCsgk9oeMCC3ia WhmGyA8339Wx3RFhhQByG+6q63S3PBd9Mem2E095UBBHeYMxjDo18d5zt A+YbbODCnA3uOCHG+0XCj3J9wrhz5dY/B/rBwXxSrqfaetIUBW14dPYSw L7MCO/eUpJ0BkjcANuYJf60Hc03e89Yc1mQoPFT3Sj2OdZmpN0SSJ237T ZrQoGxzbDOVa79Muf5+k+oGdQZ7WAvhLLR6S6ri8jh6rYmQN7GT5adqIE o3uic+0WKfHDqF2SL3QEszsswieXVhMDNXsrdmKW/ieEQynN3NmCvGEEC w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: szUApg3OTk6hqvKKhRI7lw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: b4z1f3PHRg2/70jDYHPYew== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11380"; a="31415835" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,264,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="31415835" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Mar 2025 05:37:21 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fN2LIwPEQj+XS2avHEyG7g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: kaLgaq4RTxebwSNATqk6Qg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,264,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="127535785" Received: from kniemiec-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.246.201]) by fmviesa003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Mar 2025 05:37:19 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Andi Shyti Cc: Markus Theil , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/selftests: use prandom in selftest In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20250211063332.16542-1-theil.markus@gmail.com> <20250211063332.16542-2-theil.markus@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 14:37:15 +0200 Message-ID: <874izmd0g4.fsf@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, 19 Mar 2025, "Jason A. Donenfeld" wrote: > Hi Andi, > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:19:12PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: >> Hi Markus, >> >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 07:33:30AM +0100, Markus Theil wrote: >> > This is part of a prandom cleanup, which removes >> > next_pseudo_random32 and replaces it with the standard PRNG. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Markus Theil >> >> I merged just this patch in drm-intel-gt-next. > > This is minorly annoying for me... What am I supposed to do with patches > 2 and 3? Take them through my tree for 6.16 in like half a year? Can I > just take the v1 into my tree and we can get this done with straight > forwardly? Or do you have a different suggestion for me? Feel free to apply it to your tree too. It's not ideal to have two commits for the same thing, but oh well. Acked-by: Jani Nikula -- Jani Nikula, Intel