From: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>,
<petrm@nvidia.com>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] selftests: net: exercise page pool reporting via netlink
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:20:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jc7ezia.fsf@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240411012815.174400-7-kuba@kernel.org>
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> writes:
> Add a Python test for the basic ops.
>
> # ./net/nl_netdev.py
> KTAP version 1
> 1..3
> ok 1 nl_netdev.empty_check
> ok 2 nl_netdev.lo_check
> ok 3 nl_netdev.page_pool_check
> # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/py/nsim.py | 7 ++
> tools/testing/selftests/net/nl_netdev.py | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/py/nsim.py b/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/py/nsim.py
> index 94aa32f59fdb..1fd50a308408 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/py/nsim.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/py/nsim.py
> @@ -28,6 +28,13 @@ from .utils import cmd, ip
> self.dfs_dir = "%s/ports/%u/" % (nsimdev.dfs_dir, port_index)
> ret = ip("-j link show dev %s" % ifname, ns=ns)
> self.dev = json.loads(ret.stdout)[0]
> + self.ifindex = self.dev["ifindex"]
> +
> + def up(self):
> + ip("link set dev {} up".format(self.ifname))
> +
> + def down(self):
> + ip("link set dev {} down".format(self.ifname))
Yeah, what I meant by integration pain with LNST the other day was
basically this. You end up rewriting the iproute2 API in Python.
But it is what it is.
> def dfs_write(self, path, val):
> self.nsimdev.dfs_write(f'ports/{self.port_index}/' + path, val)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/nl_netdev.py b/tools/testing/selftests/net/nl_netdev.py
> index 2b8b488fb419..afc510c044ce 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/nl_netdev.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/nl_netdev.py
> @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
> #!/usr/bin/env python3
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> -from lib.py import ksft_run, ksft_pr, ksft_eq, ksft_ge, NetdevFamily
> +import time
> +from lib.py import ksft_run, ksft_pr, ksft_eq, ksft_ge, NetdevFamily, NetdevSimDev, ip
>
>
> def empty_check(nf) -> None:
> @@ -15,9 +16,83 @@ from lib.py import ksft_run, ksft_pr, ksft_eq, ksft_ge, NetdevFamily
> ksft_eq(len(lo_info['xdp-rx-metadata-features']), 0)
>
>
> +def page_pool_check(nf) -> None:
> + with NetdevSimDev() as nsimdev:
> + nsim = nsimdev.nsims[0]
> +
> + # No page pools when down
> + nsim.down()
> + pp_list = nf.page_pool_get({}, dump=True)
> + pp_list = [pp for pp in pp_list if pp.get("ifindex") == nsim.ifindex]
This combo of page_pool_get / filter looks like it should be in a helper.
> + ksft_eq(len(pp_list), 0)
> +
> + # Up, empty page pool appears
> + nsim.up()
> + pp_list = nf.page_pool_get({}, dump=True)
> + pp_list = [pp for pp in pp_list if pp.get("ifindex") == nsim.ifindex]
> + ksft_ge(len(pp_list), 0)
> + refs = sum([pp["inflight"] for pp in pp_list])
> + ksft_eq(refs, 0)
> +
> + # Down, it disappears, again
> + nsim.down()
> + pp_list = nf.page_pool_get({}, dump=True)
> + pp_list = [pp for pp in pp_list if pp.get("ifindex") == nsim.ifindex]
> + ksft_eq(len(pp_list), 0)
> +
> + # Up, allocate a page
> + nsim.up()
> + nsim.dfs_write("pp_hold", "y")
> + pp_list = nf.page_pool_get({}, dump=True)
> + refs = sum([pp["inflight"] for pp in pp_list if pp.get("ifindex") == nsim.ifindex])
> + ksft_ge(refs, 1)
> +
> + # Now let's leak a page
> + nsim.down()
> + pp_list = nf.page_pool_get({}, dump=True)
> + pp_list = [pp for pp in pp_list if pp.get("ifindex") == nsim.ifindex]
> + ksft_eq(len(pp_list), 1)
> + refs = sum([pp["inflight"] for pp in pp_list if pp.get("ifindex") == nsim.ifindex])
The second filtering is unnecessary.
> + ksft_eq(refs, 1)
> + undetached = [pp for pp in pp_list if "detach-time" not in pp]
Maybe call this attached to be in sync with the next hunk?
> + ksft_eq(len(undetached), 0)
> +
> + # New pp can get created, and we'll have two
> + nsim.up()
> + pp_list = nf.page_pool_get({}, dump=True)
> + pp_list = [pp for pp in pp_list if pp.get("ifindex") == nsim.ifindex]
> + attached = [pp for pp in pp_list if "detach-time" not in pp]
> + undetached = [pp for pp in pp_list if "detach-time" in pp]
detached.
> + ksft_eq(len(attached), 1)
> + ksft_eq(len(undetached), 1)
> +
> + # Free the old page and the old pp is gone
> + nsim.dfs_write("pp_hold", "n")
> + # Freeing check is once a second so we may need to retry
> + for i in range(50):
> + pp_list = nf.page_pool_get({}, dump=True)
> + pp_list = [pp for pp in pp_list if pp.get("ifindex") == nsim.ifindex]
> + if len(pp_list) == 1:
> + break
> + time.sleep(0.05)
> + ksft_eq(len(pp_list), 1)
Yeah, I don't know if busywait / slowwait sort of a helper is practical
to write in Python. No idea how to go about it. But the bash experience
shows it would useful fairly often.
> + # And down...
> + nsim.down()
> + pp_list = nf.page_pool_get({}, dump=True)
> + pp_list = [pp for pp in pp_list if pp.get("ifindex") == nsim.ifindex]
> + ksft_eq(len(pp_list), 0)
> +
> + # Last, leave the page hanging for destroy, nothing to check
> + # we're trying to exercise the orphaning path in the kernel
> + nsim.up()
> + nsim.dfs_write("pp_hold", "y")
> +
> +
> def main() -> None:
> nf = NetdevFamily()
> - ksft_run([empty_check, lo_check], args=(nf, ))
> + ksft_run([empty_check, lo_check, page_pool_check],
> + args=(nf, ))
>
>
> if __name__ == "__main__":
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 1:28 [PATCH net-next 0/6] selftests: net: exercise page pool reporting via netlink Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-11 1:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] net: netdevsim: add some fake page pool use Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-11 1:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] tools: ynl: don't return None for dumps Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-11 10:12 ` Donald Hunter
2024-04-11 1:28 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] selftests: net: print report check location in python tests Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-12 7:45 ` Petr Machata
2024-04-11 1:28 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] selftests: net: print full exception on failure Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-12 8:02 ` Petr Machata
2024-04-11 1:28 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] selftests: net: support use of NetdevSimDev under "with" in python Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-12 8:07 ` Petr Machata
2024-04-11 1:28 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] selftests: net: exercise page pool reporting via netlink Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-12 8:20 ` Petr Machata [this message]
2024-04-12 13:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874jc7ezia.fsf@nvidia.com \
--to=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).