From: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
To: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com>
Cc: <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <leon@kernel.org>, <dsahern@gmail.com>,
<stephen@networkplumber.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com>,
<michaelgur@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 iproute2-next 2/3] rdma: Add an option to set privileged QKEY parameter
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:34:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jig6m1v.fsf@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231023112217.3439-3-phaddad@nvidia.com>
Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com> writes:
> Enrich rdmatool with an option to enable or disable privileged QKEY.
> When enabled, non-privileged users will be allowed to specify a
> controlled QKEY.
>
> By default this parameter is disabled in order to comply with IB spec.
> According to the IB specification rel-1.6, section 3.5.3:
> "QKEYs with the most significant bit set are considered controlled
> QKEYs, and a HCA does not allow a consumer to arbitrarily specify a
> controlled QKEY."
>
> This allows old applications which existed before the kernel commit:
> 0cadb4db79e1 ("RDMA/uverbs: Restrict usage of privileged QKEYs")
> they can use privileged QKEYs without being a privileged user to now
> be able to work again without being privileged granted they turn on this
> parameter.
>
> rdma tool command examples and output.
>
> $ rdma system show
> netns shared privileged-qkey off copy-on-fork on
>
> $ rdma system set privileged-qkey on
>
> $ rdma system show
> netns shared privileged-qkey on copy-on-fork on
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@nvidia.com>
Again, I'm not familiar with the subject matter, but mechanically this
looks OK to me.
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-24 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-23 11:22 [PATCH v2 iproute2-next 0/3] Add support to set privileged qkey parameter Patrisious Haddad
2023-10-23 11:22 ` [PATCH v2 iproute2-next 1/3] rdma: update uapi headers Patrisious Haddad
2023-10-23 11:22 ` [PATCH v2 iproute2-next 2/3] rdma: Add an option to set privileged QKEY parameter Patrisious Haddad
2023-10-24 15:34 ` Petr Machata [this message]
2023-10-24 17:02 ` David Ahern
2023-10-25 6:26 ` Patrisious Haddad
2023-10-25 8:34 ` Petr Machata
2023-10-25 8:25 ` Petr Machata
2023-10-23 11:22 ` [PATCH v2 iproute2-next 3/3] rdma: Adjust man page for rdma system set privileged_qkey command Patrisious Haddad
2023-10-24 16:09 ` Petr Machata
2023-10-24 17:04 ` David Ahern
2023-10-25 6:10 ` Patrisious Haddad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874jig6m1v.fsf@nvidia.com \
--to=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=michaelgur@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phaddad@nvidia.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).