From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=4oFk=ST=vger.kernel.org=netdev-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7346C282DA
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:57:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9074B204EC
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:57:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1732637AbfDQP5F (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:57:05 -0400
Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:61818 "EHLO mga14.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1729940AbfDQP5F (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:57:05 -0400
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20])
  by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Apr 2019 08:57:04 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,362,1549958400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="338377720"
Received: from mbhutada-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO ellie) ([10.255.89.223])
  by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Apr 2019 08:57:04 -0700
From:   Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
To:     Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>,
        Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>,
        "netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: TSN: taprio scheduler
In-Reply-To: <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B45E1B7@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com>
References: <94a8e924-028c-46f5-e842-9e4e0b2db5d3@ti.com> <87sgv9e4cs.fsf@intel.com> <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B45E1B7@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:57:04 -0700
Message-ID: <874l6wmxpr.fsf@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com> writes:

> From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
> Date: Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 21:02:43
>
>> The series that I planning to send this week has some ideas about how to
>> solve all these three points. But for hardware offloading and frame
>> preemption, all I will propose is the interface for talking to the
>> driver.
>
> Was this sent ?

Yes, here's the link to the cover letter of the RFC:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1082982/

>
> I have some setups that support Frame Preemption, EST and Time-Based 
> Scheduling.
>
> Thanks,
> Jose Miguel Abreu


Cheers,
--
Vinicius