Re: [PATCH RFC v2] rhashtable: implement rhashtable_walk_peek() using rhashtable_walk_last_seen()

NeilBrown
2018-06-15T05:31:54Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 857 bytes --]

On Fri, Jun 15 2018, Herbert Xu wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:41:05AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 7:48 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > rhashtable_walk_last_seen() does most of the work that
>> > rhashtable_walk_peek() needs done, so use it and put
>> > it in a "static inline".
>> > Also update the documentation for rhashtable_walk_peek() to clarify
>> > the expected use case.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net>
>
> Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

Thanks to your both.
I assume this is an implicit Ack for
rhashtable: add rhashtable_walk_last_seen()

I'll send out a patchset of all the acked patches shortly after the
merge window closes, and then see where we are up to.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]