From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: Route cache performance under stress
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:09:04 +0200
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <874r2wb9u7.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306101432530.21247-100000@netcore.fi>
	<20030610075702.I37165@shell.cyberus.ca>
	<Pine.LNX.4.51.0306101125500.21435@ns.istop.com>
	<87he6wbdkz.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
To: "netdev@oss.sgi.com" <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
   "linux-net@vger.kernel.org" <linux-net@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <87he6wbdkz.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (Florian Weimer's message of
 "Wed, 11 Jun 2003 21:48:12 +0200")
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:

> Yes, these numbers keep growing.  By today's standards, 6000 Mbps

Oops, that's one "0" too many.  6 Gbps is definitely still surprising.