netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<edumazet@google.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>, <petrm@nvidia.com>,
	<liuhangbin@gmail.com>, <bpoirier@nvidia.com>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: local_termination: annotate the expected failures
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 15:25:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xvhu97r.fsf@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240509235553.5740-1-kuba@kernel.org>


Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> writes:

> @@ -157,7 +168,7 @@ run_test()
>  
>  	check_rcv $rcv_if_name "Unicast IPv4 to unknown MAC address" \
>  		"$smac > $UNKNOWN_UC_ADDR1, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800)" \
> -		false
> +		false true
>  
>  	check_rcv $rcv_if_name "Unicast IPv4 to unknown MAC address, promisc" \
>  		"$smac > $UNKNOWN_UC_ADDR2, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800)" \

For veth specifically there is xfail_on_veth:

xfail_on_veth $rcv_if_name \
	check_rcv $rcv_if_name "Unicast IPv4 to unknown MAC address" \
		  "$smac > $UNKNOWN_UC_ADDR1, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800)" \
		  false

Which is IMHO clearer than passing an extra boolean.

Not sure what to do about the bridge bit though. In principle the
various xfail_on_'s can be chained, so e.g. this should work:

xfail_on_bridge $rcv_if_name \
xfail_on_veth $rcv_if_name \
	check_rcv $rcv_if_name "Unicast IPv4 to unknown MAC address" \
		  "$smac > $UNKNOWN_UC_ADDR1, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800)" \
		  false

I find this preferable to adding these ad-hoc tweaks to each test
individually. Maybe it would make sense to have:

xfail_on_kind $rcv_if_name veth bridge \
	check_rcv $rcv_if_name "Unicast IPv4 to unknown MAC address" \
		  "$smac > $UNKNOWN_UC_ADDR1, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800)" \
		  false

And then either replace the existing xfail_on_veth's (there are just a
handful) or convert xfail_on_veth to a wrapper around xfail_on_kind.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-13 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-09 23:55 [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: local_termination: annotate the expected failures Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-10  3:15 ` Hangbin Liu
2024-05-10  3:47   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-10 10:58 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-05-13 13:25 ` Petr Machata [this message]
2024-05-15  0:43   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-15  9:02     ` Petr Machata
2024-05-15 23:21       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-16  8:42         ` Petr Machata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875xvhu97r.fsf@nvidia.com \
    --to=petrm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bpoirier@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).