From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>
Cc: "Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen" <ast@fiberby.net>,
"Jamal Hadi Salim" <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
"Cong Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
"Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llu@fiberby.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] make skip_sw actually skip software
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:44:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xyodcek.fsf@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALnP8ZZYftDYCVFQ18a8+GN8-n_YsWkXOWeCVAoVZFfjLezK2Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu 15 Feb 2024 at 10:00, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:04:41PM +0000, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
> ...
>> Since we use TC flower offload for the hottest
>> prefixes, and leave the long tail to Linux / the CPU.
>> we therefore need both the hardware and software
>> datapath to perform well.
>>
>> I found that skip_sw rules, are quite expensive
>> in the kernel datapath, sice they must be evaluated
>> and matched upon, before the kernel checks the
>> skip_sw flag.
>>
>> This patchset optimizes the case where all rules
>> are skip_sw.
>
> The talk is interesting. Yet, I don't get how it is set up.
> How do you use a dedicated block for skip_sw, and then have a
> catch-all on sw again please?
>
> I'm missing which traffic is being matched against the sw datapath. In
> theory, you have all the heavy duty filters offloaded, so the sw
> datapath should be seeing only a few packets, right?
Yeah, I also didn't get the idea here. The cited paragraphs seem to
contradict each other.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-15 16:04 [PATCH net-next 0/3] make skip_sw actually skip software Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2024-02-15 16:04 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: sched: cls_api: add skip_sw counter Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2024-02-15 17:39 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2024-02-15 23:34 ` Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2024-02-16 8:35 ` Vlad Buslov
2024-02-16 12:52 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-15 16:04 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: sched: cls_api: add filter counter Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2024-02-15 17:25 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-15 23:19 ` Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2024-02-15 16:04 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: sched: make skip_sw actually skip software Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2024-02-15 17:49 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2024-02-16 12:57 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-16 15:07 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2024-02-16 13:38 ` Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2024-02-16 8:47 ` Vlad Buslov
2024-02-16 14:01 ` Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2024-02-15 18:00 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] " Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2024-02-16 8:44 ` Vlad Buslov [this message]
2024-02-16 12:17 ` Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2024-02-16 14:46 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875xyodcek.fsf@nvidia.com \
--to=vladbu@nvidia.com \
--cc=ast@fiberby.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llu@fiberby.dk \
--cc=mleitner@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).