From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7012AC433DF for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 22:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CF720674 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 22:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726881AbgESWx1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 18:53:27 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:50876 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726064AbgESWx1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 18:53:27 -0400 IronPort-SDR: s0dL1/R3Us/h7F5pHcu2RdDnoLs/qr6TqirwE4lJdkwf2/00tr+jOspT1JX2miStniA5Eb9qGS 5Oh+ppjglA/w== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 May 2020 15:53:26 -0700 IronPort-SDR: nKTbsCYzgP+JcScsxOxTpYh27usGUO8gRm2QO1LlWyhFrnpcIDYZPoG6OZy0u9psScbnkmfIMR KefAnvgTpBvw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,411,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="466307570" Received: from stputhen-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO ellie) ([10.209.5.127]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 May 2020 15:53:26 -0700 From: Vinicius Costa Gomes To: Andre Guedes , Michal Kubecek , netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, po.liu@nxp.com, m-karicheri2@ti.com, Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com Subject: Re: [next-queue RFC 0/4] ethtool: Add support for frame preemption In-Reply-To: <158992801438.36166.9692784713665851855@twxiong-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20200516012948.3173993-1-vinicius.gomes@intel.com> <20200516093317.GJ21714@lion.mk-sys.cz> <87sgfxox4x.fsf@intel.com> <158992801438.36166.9692784713665851855@twxiong-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 15:53:26 -0700 Message-ID: <875zcro7tl.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Andre Guedes writes: >> > >> >> active: active >> >> supported queues: 0xf > > Following the same rationale, is this 'supported queue' going aways as well? > I think so, with good error messages, when trying to set an express-only queue as preemptible, no need to expose this information. -- Vinicius