Re: [net v1] fib_rules: interface group matching

[Vincent Bernat <vincent@bernat.im>]

 ❦ 14 septembre 2016 17:25 CEST, David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> :

>> I could just give more time to VRF. I also had some concerns over
>> performance with the way Netfilter integration is done, but I understand
>> that I could just stay away from POSTROUTING rules which is the only
>> hook executed twice?

> With the changes that were committed this past weekend, the VRF code
> is now setup where I can set a flag on a per VRF basis to disable the
> extra rx and tx processing - ie., no network taps, no netfilter, no
> qdisc, etc. Drops the overhead of VRF to ~3% maybe a bit less. I need
> to think about the user api a bit more and formalize the patch. Given
> my other commitments that probably won't happen until mid-October. But
> in terms of a building block, the overhead of VRF is continuing to
> drop.

Fine by me. We can drop my patch.

Thanks!
-- 
Program defensively.
            - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)