From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: can: Use common error handling code in vxcan_newlink() Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 22:13:32 +0200 Message-ID: <8761e059-d33c-a157-4b2f-f01dbdf2a91e@users.sourceforge.net> References: <2e600d9a-faec-dd39-08f0-5a7fb260d7ca@users.sourceforge.net> <2ab5d794-7a5c-9036-835c-67cfcc541795@hartkopp.net> <264b3c2b-8354-5769-639c-ac8d2fcbe630@hartkopp.net> <5a76bb36-4ae0-eca2-ae34-69c2bfddb634@users.sourceforge.net> <4d612668-5423-4ce3-a4f5-ee394d7ddd21@hartkopp.net> <19ca5f23-fbb0-aaae-bff5-d634af66c264@users.sourceforge.net> <9d9b724b-229a-acab-54f8-6c45dda96f44@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde , Wolfgang Grandegger , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org To: Oliver Hartkopp , linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9d9b724b-229a-acab-54f8-6c45dda96f44@hartkopp.net> Content-Language: en-GB Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org >> Are you interested in related adjustments for a bigger code base? > > No. Definitely not. You might have noticed that I am proposing similar changes already for other software modules. ;-) > If you aim for the the deletion of “ < 0” for all rtnl_configure_link() users > you would need to do this consistently. How do you see the software situation around a function like “register_netdevice”? Regards, Markus