From: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu>
To: Julius Volz <juliusv@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Is CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6 still/really dangerous?
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:56:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87631y3nr3.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> (raw)
Hi,
In commit fab0de02fb0da83b90cec7fce4294747d86d5c6f CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6 is
described as:
Add IPv6 support to IPVS. This is incomplete and might be dangerous.
I agree its implementation is incomplete. But I wonder if it's really
dangerous in the sense that generic distribution kernels shouldn't
enable it, because it can break unrelated (eg. IPv4 IPVS) functionality.
What does that warning mean today? Isn't it out of date?
--
Thanks,
Feri.
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-04 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-04 13:56 Ferenc Wagner [this message]
2010-06-04 14:14 ` Is CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6 still/really dangerous? Julius Volz
2010-06-04 22:21 ` Ferenc Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87631y3nr3.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu \
--to=wferi@niif.hu \
--cc=juliusv@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox